Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

From the article:

“In the latest go round, the EPA proposes to expand the definition of “waters of the United States” to include essentially any pool of water big enough for a dog to take a drink out of or a bird to have a bath.”

“Of course, in order to get this through, Harry Reid will need to be forced to bring it to a vote in the Senate. This close to an election I wouldn’t bet the ranch on it. Not even the Sackett’s ranch.”


7 posted on 09/13/2014 9:09:51 AM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carthego delenda est

According to the US Constitution, I believe the federal government only has jurisdiction over the navigable waters. This use of the phrase “waters of the United States” is tyrannical thuggery.


17 posted on 09/13/2014 1:05:52 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson