Posted on 09/13/2014 6:31:54 AM PDT by rktman
Specifically, I admire men who are controlled, confident and who fulfill their biological destiny as protectors and providers. Men are essential for training boys to tame the testosterone and channel their natural strengths and aggressiveness in appropriate ways. Trained men are, in the words of columnist Dennis Prager, the glory of civilization. (It goes without saying that untrained men are its scourge, but that’s another column.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Men are born for greatness, but focus on their sex lives and their domination instead of on protecting and defending women and children.
-— There are still plenty of manly men out here that don’t concern themselves with matching their “murse” to the “outfit” they’re gonna wear today -—
I just started a job in Boston, and man, they seem to be everywhere. I don’t see any in the burbs, so hopefully it’s a city thing.
The worst one was on the train earlier this week. A hyper-groomed guy in fashionable casual clothing.... Crocheting on the train. BLEAH! I think he had crossed over from metro to playing for the other team.
Sorry, but no. Regardless of what anyone blames them for, it's not their fault that men spend so much on porn and prostitution, and have become so whipped that they won't even defend their own sons against a school system that allows girls to kick them in the nuts for no reason.
No, men chose to live in this penis dictated existence, and have no one to blame but themselves for the consequences.
Who do you hang out with?
How many fathers do you hang out with who have actually banded together to defend their sons’ rights against the biased school system?
None.
guess I’m to busy watching porn.
On the first Feminian Sandstones
we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour
and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children
and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said:
“The Wages of Sin is Death.”
Maybe it was the “wife”.
...As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;
And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!
Feminist say they don’t need men and then insist that government play daddy/hubby and provide for and protect them from all the challenges and rigors of life.
Agree
In my view and in that of humanae vitae, a widely rejected papal document, the cultural acceptance of Birth Control is at the root
That includes feminists as well as self centered men
You just pulled that entire supposition right out of your rear end. There may be a nugget of truth there, but you have absolutely no factual basis for stating that “men spend so much on porn and prostitution” except some Oprah-induced hysteria. If you are going to refuse to assign women any moral agency, then we should remove their right to vote. THEN men can be assigned all the blame.
You are aware, are you not, that one of the driving forces of the development of the internet was mens’ demand for porn?
I didn't expect anyone to be unaware of the extent of the problem, but OK, here are some numbers.
Here are the latest numbers on porn: you’d better sit down
This is money that could have been spent supporting MRAs or finding a cure for prostate cancer, but made pornographers and abusive pimps rich instead.
Now, share with me your numbers of the fathers who have defended their sons against a school system that allows girls to kick them in the nuts for no reason.
If you are going to refuse to assign women any moral agency, then we should remove their right to vote.
Talk about pulling suppositions out of your rear end. I'm not the one refusing to hold females accountable for their actions. Men, such as the fathers who refuse to defend their sons against a school system that allows girls to kick them in the nuts for no reason, are. Why don't you call them out?
THEN men can be assigned all the blame.
Straw man. I never said men should be assigned all of the blame. I said they are responsible for choosing to be so whipped that they can't even defend their own sons. Care to answer that?
Brainwashing young females
Sitemap
Feminazis typically are women who are beyond their mid-30s (and often beyond their mid-40s), and have been disappointed by and with men. Because they have hard time to find replacements for the men they have loved, they desexualized themselves. They typically have a very negative perception of male sexuality, and revenge-fantasies against men per se (though usually not admitted) are an important motivation for their “political” work. Web definition of the term Feminazi.
Like all unhappy people who rationalize their own unhappiness into an ideology, they want to convince other females (especially younger, more attractive ones) that girls and women do not need sexual relationships, and that they should not consent to sexual relationships unless the man fulfills a wide range of conditions: marriage after several years of courtship, a proven monogamous inclination, willingness to share half of the household work and child-raising responsibilities, and so on. Only very tame, and tamed, men qualify. They should be easy to control by the female partner. And extramarital affairs should only be an option for the women.
Not that feminazis would be happy to see other, younger women, have such men. Envy pays a role, and when the opportunity arises they can’t resist the temptation to dismantle the happy relationship, for example by lancing indiscretions that give rise to suspicions (which may or may not be confirmed).
The natural allies of feminazis are Christrian fundamentalists who cannot accept other people’s sexual happiness for their own wicked reasons.
Feminazis and Christian fundamentalists play a major role in all NGOs, organizations through which volunteers presumably help others, but all too often are only interested to find self-fulfillment by doing what they consider good deeds (in the tradition of Abraham Lincoln), or, even worse, through which they try to redo the world in a manner so that it fits their ideologies.
Abraham Lincoln on doing good: “When I do good, I feel good. When I do bad, I feel bad. That’s my religion.”
Brainwashing young females so that they believe they do not need sexual relationships is a major part of their programs. They may hide behind AIDS awareness campaigns, or NGOs that address violence against women or human trafficking.
Violence against women, just as violence against men, are crimes that rightly are handled by the police, and so is human trafficking. But because both feminazis and Christian fundamentalists shy away from confronting the mafia and other hardened criminals, they have an intrinsic tendency to criminalize normal men: family fathers who sometimes get angry (just as family mothers do), boyfriends who exhibit their desire towards a steady girlfriend.
Feminazis out to aide in the persecution of men need rape to happen, and in a non-dangerous environment, otherwise they have no cases the persecution of which aides in their self-fulfillment. This is one of the reasons why the definitions for rape are constantly widened. “Marital rape” and “date rape” are resulting terminologies.
You are aware, are you not, that “adult” video stores existed before the internet? Even if we accept that a main driver of the early increase of the internet was porn, that still says NOTHING about what percentage of men partake, and how often, and whether that indulgence is the cause of all our modern problems. And, as a last quick question, are you aware of the number of women with pornographic webcam-type sites, not to mention the prevalence of nude selfies on the internet? Still think you have the slightest clue what is really going on?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.