Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

Good points. Agreed. How do you feel about the media using drones for news coverage and commercial companies using them for product delivery?

I don’t think a private citizen should be able to fly a drone over my property regardless of his limited financial resources or legal culpability. If he were using a camera or cell phone, he’d have to trespass on my property to record. Same should apply to a drone, IMHO.


34 posted on 09/12/2014 1:09:40 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
I don’t think a private citizen should be able to fly a drone over my property regardless of his limited financial resources or legal culpability.

Seriously, what are they going to see that can't be seen on Google Earth?

43 posted on 09/12/2014 1:19:14 PM PDT by MeganC (It took Democrats four hours to deport Elian Gonzalez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I would say that the airspace above a private residence should be traffic limited below a certain altitude (say 100 feet). This has more to do with noise abatement than privacy. Due to the necessity of flying, airspace has to be public space with restrictions.

As for news law enforcement, no problem. Flying over a residence to view the back yard is no different than an officer looking over the fence.

As for commercial, they should limit their flight paths to above 100’ and to the greatest extent possible, observe public roads.


44 posted on 09/12/2014 1:22:28 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson