Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

No. The whole idea is to create a better whole from the parts. You cannot just pick up your toys and go play.

And where all you turn for trade? Mexico? Half of Mexico is already in Texas.


66 posted on 09/11/2014 1:01:55 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

The whole was only formed

AT THE CONSENT OF THE PARTS.

Consent can inherently be withdrawn.

The sovereignty of the state superceded the sovereignty of the “whole”.

And why would the remaining states not trade with the Republic of Texas? I’m sure they’d give us some good deals.


67 posted on 09/11/2014 1:05:18 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

“And where all you turn for trade?”

Texas already exports more high-tech goods and services than any state, including that one that has silly con valley.

If Texas were its own country, it would be the 6th largest oil producing nation in the world. The Texas-less USA would need some of that oil, especially since it depends on it right now.

The Texas-less USA would need Texas more than vice-versa.


76 posted on 09/11/2014 1:46:51 PM PDT by Vision Thing (obama wants his suicidal worshipers to become suicidal bombers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson