Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WayneS
In Federalist #43, Madison indicated that because the Constitution was a contract or compact, not a treaty, it would be governed under contract law, not treaty law. Under treaty law, if you think you're getting a raw deal, you can simply withdraw from the treaty by notifying the other partners of your withdrawal. Under contract law, if you think you're getting a raw deal, you must ask the other parties to the contract for permission to withdraw.

Madison believed that unanimous consent would be required for even one state to secede because that act of secession would dissolve the Union and abrogate the contract.

Under Madison's guidelines, all the states would have to approve the withdrawal of Texas, and then the states could, if they wished, reinstate the Union without Texas.

52 posted on 09/11/2014 12:24:44 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Publius
Madison believed that unanimous consent would be required for even one state to secede because that act of secession would dissolve the Union and abrogate the contract.

I know that Madison said that a proper secession required the consent of the other states but I'm not aware where he said it required unanimous consent.

99 posted on 09/11/2014 3:31:58 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson