Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Justa

>> an unfortunate result.

A foreseeable result.

>> Did we directly arm ISIS?

Yes.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-syria-used-chemical-weapons-crossing-red-line/

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/06/13/red_lined_white_house_says_it_knows_for_sure_that_assad_used_chemical_weapons

Further commentary: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3202804/posts


49 posted on 09/10/2014 10:36:40 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

There is nothing in any of those citations saying or proving we provided arms to ISIS. There is only speculation. Unsourced speculation is not proof. If we provided arms to ISIS then why did we train and arm FSA which is fighting ISIS? Why are we bombing ISIS? Why are we coordinating attacks against ISIS with the Kurds, Iraqis and Syrians?

....So the British armed Hitler at Dunkirk?


50 posted on 09/10/2014 10:53:30 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson