Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meadsjn

Would you say the problematic population you speak of, is as broad and widespread as ours is, or are we talking about a smaller percentage of the total?


35 posted on 09/09/2014 10:51:02 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (We'll know when he's really hit bottom. They'll start referring to him as White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
I'm not sure. I haven't visited England since 1977, and that was only for a couple of weeks.

Their UKIP voters seem to be as outraged as our TEA Party at the systemic dysfunction and decline. The big difference is their subjects don't have any rights to self-defense, and their sub-humans are very at-ease with their criminal behavior, knowing that the liberals will bend over backwards to keep the criminals in business, and keep the media cover-ups going.

In the USA, whites make up 72.4% of the population; blacks are 12.6%.

In England whites make up 85.4%; blacks are 3.5%; Asians (UK code for muslims) are 7.8%.

Slightly different set of problems, but the liberal commies in both places started the problems, and continue to be the aggravation.

England 2011 censuses recorded the following ethnic groups:

Ethnic group 2011 population 2011%
White: Total 45,281,142 85.4
Asian or Asian British: Total 4,143,403 7.8
Black or Black British: Total 1,846,614 3.5
British Mixed: Total 1,192,879 2.3
Other: Arab[note 2] 220,985 0.4
Other: Any other ethnic group 327,433 0.6
Other: Total 548,418 1
Total 53,012,456 100

43 posted on 09/09/2014 11:40:56 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson