Maybe it’s just me....but wouldn’t we want to have one single facility handling these guys.....at some military base in Nevada...and limit all potential accidents? Or is the strategy to have forty different medical handling facilities and ensure the spread across the US as much as possible?
You would think the idea of isolating a disease would mean just that instead of having multiple places for the disease to not be so isolated.
i can see advantages to both models.
they probably want to spread the experience around
We have four of these specialized isolation, infectious disease centers. Georgia, Nebraska, Maryland, and Montana.
Remember that Ebola, Sars, etc, has been being handled in labs all over America, for years, for instance in Atlanta Ebola has been being shipped in from around the world for many years, and research conducted and animals infected, they built the Emory isolation treatment clinic just down the street from the lab.