To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
I was thinking the same. He may have had a right to shoot him but he didn’t have a need to.
15 posted on
09/07/2014 10:40:54 AM PDT by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
To: TigersEye
He may have had a right to shoot him but he didn’t have a need to. It was "for the good of Humanity".
16 posted on
09/07/2014 11:00:57 AM PDT by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
To: TigersEye
> He may have had a right to shoot him but he didn’t have a
> need to.
The shooting wasn’t the problem, because once he woke up he became aggressive. The problem was waking him up in the first place. The homeowner shouldn’t have done that.
18 posted on
09/07/2014 2:25:45 PM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson