Posted on 09/05/2014 4:01:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Oh, dear. Same with Trayvon.
Yeah, we can’t be allowed to run down the parent’s claims that their boy was a gentle giant who had never been in trouble before. That would mess with the narrative.
Dead men don’t have rights.
/johnny
Liberals never let the truth get in the way of their agenda. My quote, perfect application.
Real bad.
I love how blacks seem to like to hide the truth and advertise the lie.
What are you really afraid of there Jon???
He didn’t have any ‘record’ as an adult because he’d just turned 18. Give a fella time, already.
This writer claims his dad was a reporter. Obviously, the kid learned nothing. He’s an awful writer.
Do blacks have any idea how shallow this makes them look?
So many of them are stuck on 13, unable to own up to any responsibility on their part, or the part of members of their race.
I’d be hard on whites for acting this way. And if it were whites playing the knock out game against blacks, I’d be furious about it.
Alas, until blacks grow up and act like adults on these issues, I’ll simply have to consider the most vocal ones to be stunted in their growth, stuck intellectually on 13.
Maoists hate it when folks know too much.
Best portray the cop as a gentle-giant killer then; don’t want to pry....
The best predictor of future aggressive antisocial behavior is a history of similar behaviors, especially with an early onset.
“If there is significant baggage to the life of Michael Brown”
That’s exactly what they’re doing you jabbering idiot.
I think the desire to make the records public is because of the patently false narrative of the “gentle giant” created by the main stream propaganda media.
Given these pictures of the “gentle giant” flashing gang sign, folks figure that where’s smoke there must be fire:
A Freeper identifying him/herself as a Missouri lawyer weighed in on this *very* subject about a week ago.He/she mentioned a decision in Missouri case law that specifically ruled that juvenile criminal records are,in fact,private in Missouri but *ONLY* while the individual is alive.The state's privacy law is only for the benefit of the individual him/herself.I guess that's tied in to the fact that under English Common Law a deceased person cannot be "slandered" of "libeled" in the legal sense.
How does getting the juvenile records blame the police officer that was attacked by the thug.
They don’t care what we think. It’s one of the pillars of their society, if you can call it that.
That is what this is all about
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.