To: Vigilanteman
“How is an employee meal any different? “
It is a ‘benefit’ to the employee.
To: TexasGator
“It is a benefit to the employee.”
Yes and we wouldn’t want companies doing anything to benefit their employees. Only the government is allowed to do that.
23 posted on
09/05/2014 8:09:41 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: TexasGator; Quality_Not_Quantity
My point is that in a modern corporation, an employee has little difference from a production machine in role and function. The machine is taxed on the profits it produces. The gas, oil and electricity is a necessary expense to keep the machine operating.
By the same logic, an employee working an eight hour shift ought to be able to have the cost for a business meal count as a necessary expense to keep the human machine operating. If (s)he is working a 12 hour shift or more, then at least two meals.
27 posted on
09/05/2014 8:40:17 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson