ditto
To sum up the differences between Reagan and Obama when it come to threats to the USA:
Reagan on the fighting the Soviet Union in the Cold War ”WE win THEY LOSE”.
Obama’s inability to respond to fight ISIS in Iraq because he was elected as the get out of Iran President ”I’m right your wrong”. And he’s not going to change his mind.
He cannot put American forces there to protect us because his prideful ego would have to admit that his get out of Iraq policy was the wrong thing to do.
I believe he’s putting his pride ahead of the safety of America, he simply will not agree to fight ISIS.
We are defenseless with this mans price and narcissistic ego running this country.
We certainly do so have a president.
He was voted in twice, second time close enough for fraud, if that was the case.
Whining and whining.
He is just not that into us.
In Audacity of Hope he writes: I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction. The quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of The Audacity of Hope.
Maybe he will wait till the FBI can make a legal case against those ISIS hostage killers before he has the military bring them in.
Time to take America back!
H. L. Mencken
I agree that it’s very hard to imagine anyone who still respects or supports this loser. But, it’s also very hard to underestimate the depths to which a Low Information Voter will go to keep themselves in that treasured Low Information status. I recently overheard a discussion in our break room, and astounded to discover that there is no unrest in the Middle East. You see, ISIS doesn’t exist. They’ve hired actors from some other Middle East country, Cambodia was mentioned, and everything else is just Hollywood special effects and camera tricks. All of this was done by “Those People” to make, (this IS a quote) “The One Perfect Man” look bad. Lest you think this was just a certain type of LIV, let’s just say that the discussion crossed more than one ethnic line.
Bump
I wish we didn’t have a president. “NOTHING” is better than what we have.
He really thought that he as a Muslim, or brought up in that enviornment, all the world would come to a collective sigh that finally we have a good guy who "stands with the Muslim's" in the White House. Thus he turned his wrath to the R's. His enemies are not "core alquada", isil, or islamists radicals (he still has not uttered those two words together at anytime in his Presidency) his true unabashed enemies that must be destroyed are Republicans, especially teaparty types like you and me, we are the enemy.
A week ago the president didn't have a strategy. Now he doesn't even have an objective.
President Rspect is voting "present" again.
Enemy islamist President
He doesn’t want to destroy because he GAREES with the Caliphate!!! And he says “ISIL” which means he want Israel to be a MUSLIM STATE!! THAT is what the “L” means in ISIL. Everyone that doesn’t want that says ISIS!!! It’s a HUGE TELL!!
“Heres hoping we can avoid world war until we get one two years from now.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I actually DID expect him to be this bad but I wonder if Lonsberry has considered that it is actually conceivable that when we “get one two years from now” we will get someone even worse. That may sound impossible but then I heard from some that we “couldn’t possibly” do any worse than GHW Bush, Slick Willie Clinton, GW Bush. I wonder how many still believe any of that. Some thought we could not do worse than “Tricky Dick” but I think that idea has been laid to rest for good even though I am NOT a Nixon admirer. Imagine someone with Obama’s narcissistic amorality combined with LBJ’s ability to twist arms and Richard Nixon’s brain. No, I don’t know who that might be but at this stage eight years ago I had never heard of Barack Hussein Obama and I did not fully comprehend what a disaster in the making he was until sometime in 2008.