To: markomalley
Anyone who thinks an Article V convention wouldn’t be absolutely and completely hijacked by progressives in both parties is living in a dream world.
21 posted on
09/03/2014 6:45:16 AM PDT by
zeugma
(The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
To: zeugma
Anyone who thinks an Article V convention wouldn’t be absolutely and completely hijacked by progressives in both parties is living in a dream world. BUMP. This is a bad, bad idea. It opens up a Pandora's Box.
I refuse to be convinced otherwise, the opinions of Mark Levin, Tom Coburn, and Freepers notwithstanding.
To: zeugma
Ya think? They already have a plan for a Article V convention as well.
24 posted on
09/03/2014 6:58:54 AM PDT by
Theoria
(I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
To: zeugma; Constitution Day; TomGuy
<>Anyone who thinks an Article V convention wouldn’t be absolutely and completely hijacked by progressives in both parties is living in a dream world.<>
Not true. The states won't send representatives with carte blanche authority to do as they wish. They will send delegates, with specific commissions that limit their powers.
27 posted on
09/03/2014 7:24:03 AM PDT by
Jacquerie
(Article V. If not now, when?)
To: zeugma
"Anyone who thinks an Article V convention wouldn’t be absolutely and completely hijacked by progressives in both parties is living in a dream world." How would they "hijack" it? And if they did, how would the product ever be ratified by 3/4ths of the states? And based on the world we live in today, what's the downside?
49 posted on
09/04/2014 1:00:17 PM PDT by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson