Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz: Federal judge’s abortion decision a ‘real war on women’
washington Times ^ | August 30, 2014 | Kellan Howell

Posted on 09/01/2014 8:52:59 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas Republican, called a federal judge’s Friday decision to strike down stricter medical regulations on abortion and the clinics a “real war on women.”

The bill, which was signed by Gov. Rick Perry last July, would place limits on abortions after 20 weeks and set tighter safety standards on abortion clinics in the state.

“Today’s decision is a setback and would allow abortion facilities to continue operating under substandard conditions — that is a real war on women,” Mr. Cruz, who is considering a bid for president in 2016, wrote on his Facebook page.
The new standards, set to begin on Monday, would have effectively shut down many clinics across the sprawling state, particularly hitting those outside a handful of big cities, according to the Texas Tribune.

“The court is firmly convinced that the State has placed unreasonable obstacles in the path of a woman’s ability to obtain a previability abortion,” Judge Lee Yeakel, who was appointed to the federal bench by President George W. Bush, wrote in his opinion.

Democratic State Sen. Wendy Davis, who is running for governor and who catapulted to national fame and the #StandWithWendy hashtag in her eventually unsuccessful bid to filibuster the bill, agreed with the ruling, calling it a “victory for women’s health care.”
“These decisions should only be made between a woman, her doctor and her God — not Austin politicians like Attorney General Greg Abbott, who would make abortion illegal even in cases of rape and incest,” Ms. Davis said, adding a shot at her Republican rival in the gubernatorial race, according to the Tribune.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cruz; tedcruz

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

 

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan

 

"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792

 

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams

 

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

 


1 posted on 09/01/2014 8:52:59 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; RitaOK; MountainDad; ...
Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
2 posted on 09/01/2014 8:53:33 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Does anyone else find irony in the argument that laws such as this would lead to a catastrophic epidemic of back alley rusty coat hanger abortions?

I ask because this argument is made by the same proponents who insist there is somehow a constitutional right to obtain rusty knife unregulated storefront abortions from facilities without the means to provide emergency lifesaving care when things go badly. In fact they take issue with the idea there is a problem when moderate to high risk medical procedures (abortions) are performed by providers without the skills, licenses, or privileges to perform either emergency care or even in-patient follow up for those who require post emergency care.


3 posted on 09/01/2014 9:22:45 AM PDT by BlueNgold (Have we crossed the line from Govt. in righteous fear of the People - to a People in fear of Govt??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Democratic State Sen. Wendy Davis, who is running for governor and who catapulted to national fame and the #StandWithWendy hashtag in her eventually unsuccessful bid to filibuster the bill, agreed with the ruling, calling it a “victory for women’s health care.”

Right. Because even if abortion were a legitimate medical procedure, women's health care is definitely improved by allowing abortions to be performed under health and hygiene standards that are more lax than those that regulate the local beauty salon and not even enforced. Suuuuure.

4 posted on 09/01/2014 9:23:43 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Here’s another question for the abortion proponents fighting this law...

Would you support a law allowing your 11 yr old son or daughter to have a tonsilectomy from a storefront clinic not subject to surgical standards and who’s providers did not have privileges to provide post operative or post emergency care? Further, would you support laws saying they can have this procedure without your knowledge or consent?


5 posted on 09/01/2014 9:33:53 AM PDT by BlueNgold (Have we crossed the line from Govt. in righteous fear of the People - to a People in fear of Govt??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Sure. Why don’t we have appendectomies in clinics whose doctors don’t have hospital privileges nearby?


6 posted on 09/01/2014 9:37:48 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

This judge is a typical liberal, filled with hate for others.


7 posted on 09/01/2014 9:39:46 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; All
As just mentioned in a related thread, please consider the following about so-called constitutional health protections, actually the lack thereof.

One of the major problems with federal Democrats wrongly establishing vote-winning federal healthcare programs outside the framework of the Constitution since the FDR administration, constitutionally indefensible Obamacare Democratcare the most recent example, such programs actually based on state powers and state revenues which the corrupt feds have stolen from the states, is that healthcare has never been enumerated as a constitutionally protected right.

So what we're seeing is misguided activist healthcare judges complementing corrupt lawmakers by wrongly legislating "constitutional" healthcare rights from the bench.

8 posted on 09/01/2014 1:12:09 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold
Perfect answer....But you're preaching to the Choir here...
9 posted on 09/01/2014 7:20:59 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

I ask because this argument is made by the same proponents who insist there is somehow a constitutional right to obtain rusty knife unregulated storefront abortions from facilities without the means to provide emergency lifesaving care when things go badly.


With the conviction of some baby butchers of late, I don’t hear much about coat hangers these days.


10 posted on 09/04/2014 1:42:00 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson