Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No, I will repeat, supposedly the cop’s “protocol” was to pursue, this according to his girlfriend’s call in to the radio station.

This is the weak link. The cop was safe, Mikey had gone on. The cop didn’t have to pursue and was beyond the point of having to defend himself. The cop could have gotten backup and they could have arrested Mikey for robbery and assaulting a cop later. There was no immediacy to the situation at that particular second.

Yet, claims of “protocol” to pursue in an attempt to cover the cop getting out of the car, by himself, injured (supposedly, we have no actual information on that, just a rumor of eye socket injury later contradicted) to pursue.

Nonsensical.


106 posted on 09/01/2014 8:26:18 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk
The cop didn’t have to pursue and was beyond the point of having to defend himself.

So cops should never "pursue" perpetrators until they have backup?

Even if the perpetrators are still there, circling your squad like hyenas?

112 posted on 09/01/2014 8:37:00 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson