Posted on 08/30/2014 10:13:39 AM PDT by Steelfish
CIA Now Admits That President Obama Is A Radical Islamic Enemy of America
Vicky Nissen
August 28, 2014 It’s an explosive charge, one that practically accuses the president of treason.
If you want to receive further articles, please click on SUBSCRIBE.
Today, a former CIA agent bluntly told the newspaper, World Net Daily, that America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama. Clare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.
Clare M. Lopez is the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute. Since 2013, she has served as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi.
Also Vice President of the Intelligence Summit, she formerly was a career operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency, a professor at the Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies, Executive Director of the Iran Policy Committee from 2005-2006, and has served as a consultant, intelligence analyst, and researcher for a variety of defense firms. She was named a Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute in 2011.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Yes. Or a terminal medical problem. (Breitbart).
I'm sure you have credentials that surpass these...
Clare M. Lopez is the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute. Since 2013, she has served as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi. Also Vice President of the Intelligence Summit, she formerly was a career operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency, a professor at the Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies, Executive Director of the Iran Policy Committee from 2005-2006, and has served as a consultant, intelligence analyst, and researcher for a variety of defense firms. She was named a Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute in 2011.
Perhaps that why there are two ASSes in that word!
Welcome to the Examiner, where the pop-ups and redirects are only surpassed by the hyperbole. They are on our side, but damn, they are a blight on the internet.
You and I are in agreement. I pray to God that Obama is protected. Making him a martyr would tear this country apart.
Huh?
You mean “Vicky Nissen”, and perhaps you want to give us the direct link to the CIA’s statement.
ansel12 - rooty toot ...
So in your mind the CIA has made a statement on this.
Why do you think that?
Your problem is with the title of the article? That’s deep!
As much as I despise Obama, I do not want to see any harm come to him. It would be an absolute disaster for the country. If the "powers that be" decide he needs to leave office, let it be done by exposing a scandal that even his strongest supporters cannot tolerate.
Well yeah, sane people do find fault with such things.
So it is a lie, the CIA has not admitted it, or said it, or does the CIA have anything to do with this article from a terrible source that just publishes anything, with zero standards.
Why is the CIA even in the title?
Who is your hero? The guy in the Sonic commercials who only reads book covers?
You have plenty of company here it seems but why the kneejerk apologetics for 0bama?
I agree with your every word.
What is worrisome is that they might want to create a disaster.
You are expressing some weird kind of voodoo emotionalism, evidently in your mind, we just shake our spears and chant in unison, to heck with news discernment and rational thought, and seeking credible sources and writing, to you this is like some tribal ceremony and some of us are making you angry by not closing off our minds and just feeling the emotion of it all.
That is your explanation for ignoring the substance of the article and focusing on the title?
LOL, the things that make you obsessively crazy with anger are baffling, I get the impression you can harp on this for hours.
You seem to be a perfect customer for the Examiner.
Still avoiding the substance of the article you now attack its source. Very mature.
Beg to differ, Not going to happen......When the recent democratic Presidents physically leave 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, they are always close by, think Carter, the Clintons, and soon to be Obama. The only way we would ever get rid of them is when they die of natural causes. That’s one thing I can say about when a Republican President leaves 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, they leave and don’t continually try to dictate policy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.