Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MaxMax

“No, that can be removed also.”

I agree with you that a “VivaInk” tattoo is not the Mark of the Beast. I do think that the concept of the “digital tattoo” is part of an overall conditioning of the masses to accept the idea of altering their bodies with technology.

So why does Revelation tell us that taking the Mark of the Beast is an unforgiveable sin? Perhaps it will be a genetic alteration that will pollute the DNA of much of mankind - as in the days of Noah.


15 posted on 08/30/2014 4:33:26 AM PDT by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Junk Silver

it’s an unforgivable sin because it means that person has rejected Jesus Christ.


18 posted on 08/30/2014 4:51:33 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Junk Silver

Good theory regarding the corrupting of DNA. I’ve never thought about it from that point of view.


32 posted on 08/30/2014 5:29:06 AM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson