Skip to comments.
RNC to spend $100m to get out vote
The Washington Examiner ^
| 8-28-14
| David M. Drucker
Posted on 08/28/2014 10:15:28 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: afraidfortherepublic
except in districts where McConnell decides the candidate is a TEA party candidate I expect
21
posted on
08/28/2014 10:38:33 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
As usual, Diana, you’ve got it! I’ll add one more thing — stop calling your long time supporters at 9 AM on a Sunday morning. We’re either in Church, on our way to Church, or sleeping in after a late Saturday night. Sunday calls should be postponed until afternoon.
To: afraidfortherepublic
They have spent over $100 million on this “campaign”? Doing what? I haven’t seen or heard anything from the GOP that would motivate me to vote for them.
23
posted on
08/28/2014 10:40:42 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: dfwgator
24
posted on
08/28/2014 10:41:09 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: zek157
Bounce Harry Reids skinny ass out of there so the house and senate can force Obama to veto popular ideas....
Doom and Gloom around here is cute.
To: skeeter
That is part of the same campaign, isn’t it?
26
posted on
08/28/2014 10:42:30 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: afraidfortherepublic
What are they going to do? Pay the blacks to come out and vote against the conservative candidates?
27
posted on
08/28/2014 10:42:30 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfusbutcher)
To: afraidfortherepublic
While there is certainly something to be said for a computerized approach to getting out your voters, this over-emphasis on just that phase, at the expense of actually trying to convert people who are not
yet your voters, illustrates a major fallacy in thinking.
Tragically, the "Rove era"--if I may be permitted that personalization of the problem--has seen the party largely abandon the idea that we can actually win a debate over policy issues; that we can actually convert Democratic voters, and presently indifferent voters, to a Conservative point of view.
From personal experience in reaching out, I know that this is the mistake that I discuss. For a fraction of what will be spent getting out those already on our side, a major inroad could be made among those who now buy into the media smears of our side.
Here is a "How To" piece that discusses such issues as defunding Obamacare & threatened Government shut downs:
How To Respond To Anti-American Lies In An Election.
If we just get out our present vote, and they turn out the voters bribed by entitlements, we lose again. It doesn't work. Even with less entitlements, Rove virtually skinned his teeth in 2000 & 2004, before losing in 2006. It just doesn't work.
William Flax
28
posted on
08/28/2014 10:42:31 AM PDT
by
Ohioan
To: zek157
29
posted on
08/28/2014 10:43:03 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: afraidfortherepublic
There’s millions of us who can’t wait to vote. Things are very scary
30
posted on
08/28/2014 10:43:11 AM PDT
by
reefdiver
(The fool says there is no God. And the bigger fools sees direct evidence and rages against it.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
$100M to turn out Democrats.
Great.
31
posted on
08/28/2014 10:43:51 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(FReerepublic: Bring a FRiend!)
To: Blackirish
You call it “Doom and Gloom” we call it “Realism.”
32
posted on
08/28/2014 10:44:36 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: afraidfortherepublic
If it’s like the last one (designed by Bay Area Democrat Techies) they’ve already been sabotaged.
To: afraidfortherepublic
34
posted on
08/28/2014 10:48:47 AM PDT
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: afraidfortherepublic
$100 million can buy a lot of cans of Malt Liquor.
35
posted on
08/28/2014 10:49:30 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
To: Timber Rattler
If the RNC gave me $100,000,000.00, I MIGHT consider voting for them...then, too...
36
posted on
08/28/2014 10:50:06 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: Timber Rattler
If the RNC gave me $100,000,000.00, I MIGHT consider voting for them...then, too...
37
posted on
08/28/2014 10:50:24 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: Blackirish
So true....a bunch of bitter sad sacks and whiners, not to mention purists dominate the site it seems. It’s a shame since this site used to have interesting folks with an intellectual curiosity and not to mention fun.
38
posted on
08/28/2014 10:53:24 AM PDT
by
Dave W
To: afraidfortherepublic
Hopefully they didn't have Democrats programming this app like Romney's bunch did in 2012, with the GOTV app that completely crashed on election day.
39
posted on
08/28/2014 10:59:06 AM PDT
by
Major Matt Mason
("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
To: afraidfortherepublic
wouldn’t it just be cheaper to offer a free pack of cigarettes and a baloney sammich to 10 million low information voters to vote for “R”?
40
posted on
08/28/2014 11:01:16 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson