Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/27/2014 8:07:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

I think the headline writer meant profligate — not promiscuous— but the point is clear nonetheless.


2 posted on 08/27/2014 8:12:38 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Agreed! They are both militarized police; it compliments this idea that the soldiers serving as guards on USA bases are called MPs (for Military Police).


3 posted on 08/27/2014 8:12:56 AM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The Promiscuous Use of SWAT Teams Is a Bigger Problem Than Armored Vehicles on Our Streets

This is so. And the only way to fix it is to pierce the immunity shield that the judiciary has fabricated from whole cloth.

Cops who obtain warrants on flimsy or fabricated representations need to be personally liable - criminally and civilly.

Cops who execute no-knock warrants at the wrong address need to be personally liable - criminally and civilly.

Judges who issue warrants on flimsy or fabricated representations need to be personally liable - criminally and civilly.

No-knock warrants need to suffer strict scrutiny as to whether alternative means to accomplish the search or arrest could be employed. Again, with personal liability for both the cops and the issiung judge for use of excessive force.

The nascent totalitarian police state needs to be strangled.

4 posted on 08/27/2014 8:18:18 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

5% Carry 100% of Free Republic Expense


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR Or Lose It

5 posted on 08/27/2014 8:23:47 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Do SWAT members get paid more for their service?


6 posted on 08/27/2014 8:27:20 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I often hear of “a few bad cops” giving all the others a bad name. The question then becomes; “Why don’t the good cops, turn in the bad cops?” The only comparison, and I will be the first to admit that it is an unfair one, is to Islam.

We are always told of the radical 10% that are the trouble makers, but we never hear anything from the other 90%, that rebukes the actions of the minority.

Same holds true of police, no matter how poorly or illegally an officer has acted, his brothers and sisters in blue will NOT speak up against him.

Another impediment to cleaning up law enforcement is that when an officer is found guilty of misconduct, the tax payers and not the officer are on the hook for any costs. The officer may lose their job, but the tax payer foots the bill.

So what can we do to fix this situation? Well as my old First Sergeant used to say; “Don’t complain unless you have a solution to the problem.” Well here is my idea.

Any and all monetary damages awarded to a plaintiff as a result of the actions of law enforcement officers, are to ONLY come from the offending departments or organizations pension fund.

Only when it hits home personally by weakening every officers retirement, will the good ones begin to turn in the bad ones. In time, department phycologists and training officers will do a better job of weeding out the nut jobs. Senior staff will do a better job of triple checking addresses before conducting a “no-knock” late night call to a suspect’s home. Officers will advise their partners that a course of action is not advised, rather than just going along.

And once this has happened, law enforcement might begin to gain some of the mountain of trust and respect that they have lost in past few years.


11 posted on 08/27/2014 9:27:35 AM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Good post. Thank you.


13 posted on 08/27/2014 9:46:28 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Why is it that we never hear of SWAT teams raiding a residence in section 8 housing, or well-known gang hangouts ?


24 posted on 08/27/2014 11:30:41 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No Knock = No Daddy coming home!


25 posted on 08/27/2014 11:35:48 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Re: “The unseemly eagerness of many police officers to dress up and act like soldiers.”

In my town, east of Seattle, a cop with 10 years experience gets paid more than a first year Army major.

And, I’ll speculate that the average cop is engaged in violent hand-to-hand combat each year more often than the average Army major.


26 posted on 08/27/2014 11:54:29 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson