[Yosemitest]

"Israel’s “historic claims” are meaningless
compared to the fact that
they are there now
and no one has the right to move them, destroy them, or take their land by treaty or contract.
But, if THEY ALLOW their land to be taken,
then they NO LONGER have a right to it."

It sounds like you support the terrorists effort to take Israel's land by force.
I remind you of comment #13.

But I remember this:

" The time is come,
the day draweth near:
let NOT the buyer rejoice,
NOR the seller mourn:
for WRATH is upon ALL the multitude thereof.

For the seller shall NOT RETURN to that which is sold,
although they were yet alive:
for the vision is touching the WHOLE multitude thereof,
which shall NOT RETURN;
NEITHER shall ANY strengthen himself in the INIQUITY of his life.

They have BLOWN the trumpet,
even to make ALL ready;
BUT NONE GOETH TO THE BATTLE:
FOR MY WRATH IS UPON ALL THE MULTITUDE THEREOF. "

[Bryanw92]

>>It sounds like you support the terrorists effort to take Israel’s land by force.

No, I don’t. But, in the history of humanity, land taken by force must be taken back by force. So, what I mean is that they have every right to their land. But, if they do lose it, they can’t expect it to be given back through lawsuits or UN action. So, they need to defend it.

Likewise, the muzzies DO NOT have a right to that land because they already lost it. But, in the history of man, taking land by force is generally recognized as legal after the fighting ends.