Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LGBT Movement’s “New Morality”: Making Gay Okay
Accuracy in Academia ^ | August 24, 2014 | Spencer Irvine

Posted on 08/25/2014 9:02:04 AM PDT by Academiadotorg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2014 9:02:04 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

A “projectile vomit distance champion alert” would have been nice. :p


2 posted on 08/25/2014 9:06:42 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

Sorry, gay is not ok. It is not normal. One can do what they want in the privacy of their own living quarters but I don’t need it in my face every waking moment. And, I don’t need laws to tell me I must approve of unnatural sex acts between same sexes.


3 posted on 08/25/2014 9:07:48 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

Probably a great book. Too bad it’s 15 years too late.


4 posted on 08/25/2014 9:11:41 AM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Isaiah 5:20

¶Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!


5 posted on 08/25/2014 9:13:08 AM PDT by Ripliancum (Mosiah 29:27. Look it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

If it is OK there would be no need to rationalize.

Their next idiot theory will be just as faulty.

No sale.

.


6 posted on 08/25/2014 9:14:30 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

“Making” something OK does not mean, that in an objective sense, it becomes OK. That only means that many have grown weary of trying to make sense of the obvious conflicts and incongruities of being deliberately and offensively “gay” and in your face about it, and have just said, “Go ahead, do what you want.”

Bad behavior is best attenuated by paying no attention to it. But such a strategy takes sometimes a long time, while aversion therapy promises very quick results in most instances.


7 posted on 08/25/2014 9:15:50 AM PDT by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Reilly is a great scholar of international relations and classical music as well.


8 posted on 08/25/2014 9:17:38 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg
I read an article discussing this premise not too long ago.

The author stated, approximately, "Who would be in favor of gays being openly shaken down by cops for lunch money, or gays being beaten to a pulp for nothing other than their mere existence? However, this desire for basic social equality for all people does NOT equate to tacit permission to put Caligula's bedroom on display in our elementary schools."

Speaking solely for myself, I don't approve of the gay lifestyle, but neither do I bear an obsessive hatred for them. "Live and let live" would be a pretty good summation.

Unfortunately, that tolerance has been subverted by current culture to allow gays to *demand* not just my tolerance, but my celebration of their choices, and *demand* access to my children. Neither of which I am prepared to acquiesce.

A Hard Rain is comin' on this issue.

9 posted on 08/25/2014 9:17:57 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg
What's scary is the pro-gay agenda has been pushed down into the elementary schools. California's idiot Governor signed legislation making the gay agenda mandatory in California's schools:

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Jerry Brown has signed a bill making California the first state in the nation to add lessons about gays and lesbians to social studies classes in public schools.

From our friends at Liberal Logic 101:


10 posted on 08/25/2014 9:17:58 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (Tired? There's a napp for that!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg
Argh, Obama only panders to the LGBT crowd because they donate LOTS to Democrats, especially Obama himself. But he may well be a part of the crowd. This whole thing started in the 1970’s when the American Psychiatric Association re-defined ‘homosexuality’ as a ‘variation on the norm’. So these days, it is no big deal to ‘re-define’ any word that anyone finds offensive. Like ‘American’(now it means all those who live within our borders AND any who want to come here at any time), ‘Patriots’ (Neo-Neanderthals who revere the old, white men who founded this horrible country),’Heterosexual’ (Breeders), and ‘Conservatives’(those ignorant, intolerant people who cling to their guns and religion). For those of us who believe in the integrity of words, this is an abomination of the language.
11 posted on 08/25/2014 9:21:18 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

12 posted on 08/25/2014 9:22:47 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

Homosexuality is a mental disorder (SSAD- same sex affection disorder). We don’t hate sick people, but neither do we assist them in remaining ill. But if we advocate for curing them, we are branded haters. Go figure.

HOMOSEXUAL, because there’s nothing GAY about it.


13 posted on 08/25/2014 9:22:51 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum

bump


14 posted on 08/25/2014 9:24:50 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

LGBT Movement’s “New Morality”: Making Gay Okay


Drives ‘em nuts when I don’t bite, and bullet point why. I’ve been unfriended by no small number of liberals on Facebook because of it, sometimes after very vile rants on their part.

They got nuthin’ and hate being called out on it.


15 posted on 08/25/2014 9:26:30 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

I love the way libs attach the appendage “phobia” to the gays.

Funny, I don’t like stepping in sh...er...Obamastuff.

Does that make me Obamastuff phobic?

Sorry, but while I’d treat a gay with all respect (and know and have worked well with more than you might guess), the thought of not getting my shoe in the stuff, but something else that I hold dear...is repulsive.

That’s in like “...eeeeuuuuuuuuuuhhhh!”


16 posted on 08/25/2014 9:36:33 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

...Reilly brings up the term “sodomy,” which is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as “anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex.” He contends that with rampant sexual misbehavior, rationalizations take place:

“Thus rationalizations become an engine for revolutionary change that will affect society as a whole…If you are going to center your public life on the private act of sodomy, you had better transform sodomy into a highly moral act. If sodomy is a moral disorder, it cannot be legitimately advanced on the legal or civil level.”

Reilly goes on to say that this leads to other implications, by abandoning one standard that affects others:

“As a moral act, sodomy should be normative. If it is normative, it should be taught in our schools as a standard. If it is a standard, it should be enforced. In fact…sodomy should be sacramentalized.”


17 posted on 08/25/2014 9:50:31 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Reilly, the author, is arguing against normalization. I hope you realize that.


18 posted on 08/25/2014 9:52:03 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TLI

The author agrees. He is picking apart the homosexual reasoning.


19 posted on 08/25/2014 9:54:19 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Of course, I actually read the article.

.

.

.

this time.


20 posted on 08/25/2014 9:54:36 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson