Posted on 08/25/2014 9:02:04 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
A “projectile vomit distance champion alert” would have been nice. :p
Sorry, gay is not ok. It is not normal. One can do what they want in the privacy of their own living quarters but I don’t need it in my face every waking moment. And, I don’t need laws to tell me I must approve of unnatural sex acts between same sexes.
Probably a great book. Too bad it’s 15 years too late.
Isaiah 5:20
¶Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
If it is OK there would be no need to rationalize.
Their next idiot theory will be just as faulty.
No sale.
.
“Making” something OK does not mean, that in an objective sense, it becomes OK. That only means that many have grown weary of trying to make sense of the obvious conflicts and incongruities of being deliberately and offensively “gay” and in your face about it, and have just said, “Go ahead, do what you want.”
Bad behavior is best attenuated by paying no attention to it. But such a strategy takes sometimes a long time, while aversion therapy promises very quick results in most instances.
Reilly is a great scholar of international relations and classical music as well.
The author stated, approximately, "Who would be in favor of gays being openly shaken down by cops for lunch money, or gays being beaten to a pulp for nothing other than their mere existence? However, this desire for basic social equality for all people does NOT equate to tacit permission to put Caligula's bedroom on display in our elementary schools."
Speaking solely for myself, I don't approve of the gay lifestyle, but neither do I bear an obsessive hatred for them. "Live and let live" would be a pretty good summation.
Unfortunately, that tolerance has been subverted by current culture to allow gays to *demand* not just my tolerance, but my celebration of their choices, and *demand* access to my children. Neither of which I am prepared to acquiesce.
A Hard Rain is comin' on this issue.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. Gov. Jerry Brown has signed a bill making California the first state in the nation to add lessons about gays and lesbians to social studies classes in public schools.
From our friends at Liberal Logic 101:
Homosexuality is a mental disorder (SSAD- same sex affection disorder). We don’t hate sick people, but neither do we assist them in remaining ill. But if we advocate for curing them, we are branded haters. Go figure.
HOMOSEXUAL, because there’s nothing GAY about it.
bump
LGBT Movements New Morality: Making Gay Okay
They got nuthin’ and hate being called out on it.
I love the way libs attach the appendage “phobia” to the gays.
Funny, I don’t like stepping in sh...er...Obamastuff.
Does that make me Obamastuff phobic?
Sorry, but while I’d treat a gay with all respect (and know and have worked well with more than you might guess), the thought of not getting my shoe in the stuff, but something else that I hold dear...is repulsive.
That’s in like “...eeeeuuuuuuuuuuhhhh!”
...Reilly brings up the term sodomy, which is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex. He contends that with rampant sexual misbehavior, rationalizations take place:
Thus rationalizations become an engine for revolutionary change that will affect society as a whole If you are going to center your public life on the private act of sodomy, you had better transform sodomy into a highly moral act. If sodomy is a moral disorder, it cannot be legitimately advanced on the legal or civil level.
Reilly goes on to say that this leads to other implications, by abandoning one standard that affects others:
As a moral act, sodomy should be normative. If it is normative, it should be taught in our schools as a standard. If it is a standard, it should be enforced. In fact sodomy should be sacramentalized.
Reilly, the author, is arguing against normalization. I hope you realize that.
The author agrees. He is picking apart the homosexual reasoning.
Of course, I actually read the article.
.
.
.
this time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.