Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN source: Darren Wilson didn’t suffer an eye socket fracture
Hotair ^ | 08/21/2014 | AllahPundit

Posted on 08/21/2014 2:00:46 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

I want to make sure after yesterday’s post that everyone knows it’s still in dispute whether Wilson’s eye socket was actually fractured in his altercation with Michael Brown.

What’s apparently not in dispute is that Wilson somehow emerged from the incident with part of his face swollen.

Reports that Ofc Darren Wilson had a bruised or fractured eye socket are false. #ferguson A source close to the investigation tells CNN

— Julian Cummings CNN (@JulianCummings) August 21, 2014

Wilson was taken to the hospital after the shooting. He had xrays which came back negative. He was treated for a swollen face. #ferguson

— Julian Cummings CNN (@JulianCummings) August 21, 2014

The extent of the injury matters insofar as the worse it is, the stronger Wilson’s defense will be that he reasonably feared serious injury from Brown when he allegedly charged at him. But it probably doesn’t matter that much: Obviously, the complexion of a case in which an unarmed man is shot dead changes if the defendant was attacked just moments before, especially if that attack involved going for the defendant’s gun. If the victim’s intent to harm is proved, establishing that Wilson’s fear of Brown was reasonable, then he’s one-third of the way to self-defense. He’d also have to show that Brown was advancing on him, a claim the prosecution will try to disprove, and further that Brown was so dangerous that Wilson was justified in using lethal force in bringing him down. Not an easy task given that Brown had no weapon of his own, but then that’s why the injury is important.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: darrenwilson; ferguson; michaelbrown; missouri; searchandfind
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: Pining_4_TX
They feel entitled to take whatever they want.

Yes they do. I saw one of the locals in Ferguson say they had a right to loot business, that it was their way of honoring Michael. Clearly, she felt she felt entitled.

81 posted on 08/21/2014 10:56:00 PM PDT by South40 (Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick

RE: People keep saying it’s true but never provide a source. Please, if you know anything, provide a source.

There’s a simple way to determine the truth.... THE HOSPITAL.

If Officer Wilson was indeed punched and suffered any face wounds ( eye socket fractured or not ), the doctor treating him would know and the medical report can be subpoenad in court.


82 posted on 08/22/2014 5:12:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GraceG; Nervous Tick; Hulka; River_Wrangler; Gene Eric; Georgia Girl 2; DaveA37; Jonty30; ...
I don't think any of you actually understood my point. I was NOT saying that Wilson couldn't have shot him with one eye.

The first point is, why did someone with a weapon allow a threat to get close enough to him to damage his eyes? I know it's possible, but it seems strange since this was someone who was presenting as a threat.

More importantly, if Brown damaged his eye, they were in grappling distance. Those shots would be very short range,k virtually contact shots. It would seem the evidence on the scene would be very clear if that happened.

83 posted on 08/22/2014 12:24:42 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GraceG; Nervous Tick; Hulka; River_Wrangler; Gene Eric; Georgia Girl 2; DaveA37; Jonty30; ...

I don’t know if it’s accurate, but the reports said there was no gunpowder present on Brown’s wounds. In what scenario could Brown injure Wilson’s face, and be shot by Wilson without gunpowder on the wounds? Weird.


84 posted on 08/22/2014 12:26:42 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

>> In what scenario could Brown injure Wilson’s face, and be shot by Wilson without gunpowder on the wounds?

big boy Brown punches Wilson so hard that Wilson staggers back.
Brown himself takes a step back to assess the situation.
Now they’re 3 to 4 feet apart.
Wilson shoots Brown.


85 posted on 08/22/2014 12:39:55 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The reports, and alleged story from the cop is, he confronts Brown, who then reaches in vehicle and punches him, grappling for gun that goes off once. Then he backs away. Officer comes out, tells him to stop. Brown is now 20 to 30 feet away. Puts hands up and says, “ what you gonna shoot me?”. He then charges officer who shots multiple times. Explains the location, and lack of powder on Brown. We’ll see if the facts support this.


86 posted on 08/22/2014 12:44:39 PM PDT by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick; nickcarraway
In what scenario could Brown injure Wilson’s face, and be shot by Wilson without gunpowder on the wounds?

Recall that the so-called "independent" Baden autopsy -- the only one that has been released to the public, so far as I know -- was conducted without access to Brown's clothing.

No evidence of gunpowder was found on the body...but wouldn't the clothing be more likely to harbor such evidence?

87 posted on 08/22/2014 1:03:52 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

>> Those shots would be very short range,k virtually contact shots

“Would be” is not the same as “were”.


88 posted on 08/22/2014 1:14:33 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

My understanding from what I have read is that Browns friend has told the cops that when Wilson tried to get out of his car Brown slammed him back in and reached inside and was beating the officer and then they grappled for the gun and it went off in the car but at that point nobody was injured from the weapon.

According to a friend of Wilson’s who called into a talk show the same set of events unfolded. Then Brown walked away about 35 ft before Wilson could get back out of the car and draw his weapon and tell Brown to freeze. Then Brown turned around and said some stuff and rushed at Wilson. That’s when he got shot multiple times.

I do not understand why the police dept has not released offcer Wilson’s description of the events. It seems very strange. And also a description of his injuries which they obviously know as the Asst Chief of police drove him to the hospital.


89 posted on 08/22/2014 2:17:57 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Maybe because Brown didn’t tell him he was going to hit the cop. He just hit him.


90 posted on 08/22/2014 2:51:43 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson