Washington Post Writer Says Abortion Is “A Deeply Affirmative Value”

Life News ^ | 8/21/14 | Katie Yoder

[wagglebee]

“More concrete are personal benefits, such as waiting until one is willing and able to care for a child, and societal benefits” for women, including finishing school and entering the workforce.

There is NO BENEFIT to murdering an innocent human being and adoption has always been available for those who cannot care for their babies.

[wagglebee]

Pro-Life Ping

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[Tennessee Nana]

PING

[fwdude]

These people are too evil for words.

[jsanders2001]

This isn’t news; this is normal MSM rhetoric. Now show me a liberal MSM outlet that no longer sides with the anti-lifers. Now THAT would be news.

[a fool in paradise]

What does a man know about no guilt over having an abortion?

[a fool in paradise]

He concluded by comparing abortion to “gay rights.” “For years,” he cried, “the public dialogue on gays did not comport with the private reality” and “The laws treated homosexuality as deviant, when it was common; as shameful, when it was human.”

More faggotry masquarading as "honest debate". #THECONSENSUSISINNOWSITDOWNANDSHUTUP

[Sherman Logan]

“The laws treated homosexuality ... as shameful, when it was human.”

Wow, what a really, really stupid argument.

Only things done by humans CAN be shameful. Animals are incapable of shame. And many, many things humans do are, and should be, shameful.

[Sherman Logan]

There is NO BENEFIT to murdering an innocent human being

Sure there is, including those he mentions.

I respectfully suggest that what you are trying to say is that the horrific non-benefit of killing an innocent human greatly outweighs those benefits.

[Viennacon]

Abortionists are baby killers, period. And one day, there will be firing squads

[Lady Heron]

Washington Post Writer Says Abortion Is “A Deeply Affirmative Value

There is nothing in the least wrong with that statement.

Supporting abortion deeply affirms you believe in doing or supporting evil by killing or approving the slaughter of the most innocent among us that can not defend themselves.

Yes it is a deeply affirmative value in total support of evil. Word games do not make it any less evil.

[Edgar3]

Abortion is a satanic blood offering, and is the sacrament of the left.

[Mrs. Don-o]

“Control over one’s reproduction sexual behavior is a deeply affirmative value,” he [should have said], and “It’s time to assert it.”

In other words, if you don't want a baby, don't do the baby-making thing. Gol-LEE, these people are stupid.

Like Mark Shea says, "Sin makes you stupid."

[FroggyTheGremlim]

Abortion: It's not about

women's rights,

"choice,"

freedom or responsibility.

It's about one thing and one thing only

Money!

The Abortion Industry "donates" a percentage of every abortion performed to the Democrat Party.

It's about money!

Abortionists are hired hit-men for Democrats!

[Salvation]

Eskew, director at The Glover Park Group: “Control over one’s reproduction is a deeply affirmative value,” he approved, and “It’s time to assert it.”

Sorry God has the final disapproval.

Let God's will be done!

Allow all babies in the womb to live!

[PATRIOT1876]

I wonder if the writer thinks that beheading is “A Deeply Affirmative Value”.

It's a choice that an muslim makes. Choice is very precious to the muslim thug.

[Mrs. Don-o]

[denydenydeny]

Nothing affirmative for the baby in the deal.

This is part if the ongoing “normalization” of abortion. These people figure, we’ve won every other social issue the last 50 years, why can’t we make abortion as socially sacrosanct (as opposed to legally sacrosanct) as the rest?

But abortion can’t be normalized any more than Islamic beheading can be normalized. People recognize instinctively that abortion is deeply wrong, and all the campaigns against “abortion shaming” won’t change that.

[camle]

i wonder what would happen if the woman had to ‘confirm’ the success of the ‘procedure’ by certifying the results via visual inspection?

then again i guess i don’t.