Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marijuana Demystified: 5 Health Myths Debunked
Medical Daily ^ | Aug 20, 2014 | Anthony Rivas

Posted on 08/20/2014 10:40:32 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom

Like it or not, marijuana use has increased exponentially since President Nixon declared a war no drugs in 1971. Today, marijuana — or weed, pot, cannabis, Mary Jane — is the third most popular recreational drug in the United States, behind only alcohol and tobacco. Upward of 24 million people have used it, based on the latest estimates, with 14 million using it regularly. But despite a growing warmth toward the drug, and two states (Washington and Colorado) legalizing its recreational use, there are still some people on the fence about its safety and usefulness. So, to educate you nonbelievers out there, here are five marijuana myths debunked.

It’s a Gateway Drug

This may be the biggest farce cooked up by marijuana opponents, but it makes sense. People who have tried marijuana may eventually go on to try harder drugs in search of a stronger high, and their experimentation leads them down a dangerous path toward addiction. But the science behind whether or not this is true overwhelmingly shows that it’s not.

“Because it is the most widely used illicit drug, marijuana is predictably the first illicit drug most people encounter,” a report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) said. “In the sense that marijuana use typically precedes rather than follows initiation of other illicit drug use, it is indeed a ‘gateway’ drug. But because underage smoking and alcohol use typically precede marijuana use, marijuana is not the most common and is rarely the first ‘gateway’ to illicit drug use. There is no conclusive evidence that the drug effects of marijuana are causally linked to the subsequent abuse of other illicit drugs.”

So what is the cause of other illicit drug use? As the IOM report suggested, other studies have also implicated alcohol and tobacco use as gateway drugs. But an alternative gateway may just be the trials and tribulations some kids face while growing up. “Whether marijuana smokers go on to use other illicit drugs depends more on social factors like being exposed to stress and being unemployed — not so much whether they smoked a joint in the eighth grade,” Dr. Karen Van Gundy, an associate professor of sociology at the University of New Hampshire, told CBS News.  

It’s Harmless

Although smoking weed won’t mess with a person’s body too much, it can cause a couple of the same issues that tobacco smokers experience, with the most likely one being respiratory problems. Ailments like bronchitis may sometimes develop as users inhale the tars from the rolling papers in joints and blunts. Because of this, eating marijuana-infused foods or smoking from a vaporizer, which heats the weed up just enough to release the THC (its active ingredient), may be healthier.

Smoking weed and getting behind the wheel is also relatively dangerous, with a number of studies this year finding that teens who drove while high were likely to get in crashes. One of the studies found that the number of people who crashed their cars while high tripled over the past 10 years. A person who drives while high can be up to two times more likely to crash. When accounting for teens only, another study concluded that a teen’s lack of driving experience paired with marijuana’s (or alcohol’s) effects led many teens to drive recklessly, even when not impaired, thus increasing their risk of a crash.

When it comes to more serious illnesses, marijuana may have more benefits than harms (we’ll get into that later). Despite a controversial study earlier this year suggesting it causes brain damage, other studies have shown no correlation, let alone cause. “Results indicated no significant effect of cannabis use on global neurocognitive performance,” one 2012 study said. Other opponents argue it can cause lung cancer, a condition not one study has found a link to yet.

It’s Addictive

With the majority of drugs being addicting — alcohol, tobacco, heroin, cocaine, etc — it’s easy to go ahead and say that marijuana’s addicting, too. But it’s a little more complex than that, and no, it’s not addicting. But users can develop a dependence, or a bad habit of lighting up. According to a 1994 study on the topic, however, only four percent of users develop this dependence. Compared to weed, alcohol and tobacco dependence was found among 14 and 24 percent of study participants. In a more recent study from 2007, only about nine percent of users developed dependency to the drug, whereas 15 and 24 percent of cocaine and heroin users went back again and again.

Breaking any habit can be really difficult, a recent study showed, but it’s possible with some dedication.

It Makes Users Lazy

The stereotypical stoner is all too real, unfortunately. At 30 years old, he still lies in his parents’ home, unemployed, smoking weed in his room while playing video games. Although marijuana users may never get rid of the reputation of being lazy, some evidence points to it not affecting a person’s motivation at all.

But first, supporting evidence that it does get people lazy. A study from July looked at the brains of 19 users and measured concentrations of dopamine, the chemical linked to reward, pleasure, and motivation. They found that longtime and frequent users, who tended to have more THC in their bodies were also the ones who had lower levels of dopamine in their brains. The researchers suggested that marijuana could cause a controversial — and not entirely official condition — called “amotivational syndrome,” characterized by laziness.  

But amotivational syndrome may affect other non-marijuana users just as much. One study published in the journal Psychology of Addictive Behaviors found that the syndrome affected about five to six percent of the population, both users and nonusers. These findings were later supported by another study, which also found there was no difference in motivation.

What it comes down to is, if you’re lazy when you smoke weed, you were probably lazy before, too.  

It Has No Medicinal Purpose

To say marijuana has no possible health benefits is to deny hundreds, if not thousands, of pages' worth of proof. Simply looking at this Collective Evolution article will point you in the direction of 20 studies proving its cancer-fighting benefits. According to the National Cancer Institute, cannabinoids may inhibit tumor growth by causing cell death, blocking its growth, and blocking the development of blood vessels that aid in metastasis. These marijuana ingredients may also help reduce inflammation in the colon, reducing colon cancer risk, as well as killing some kinds of breast cancer cells. And that’s only cancer.

Marijuana has also been implicated in treating glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, PTSD, anxiety, and a host of other conditions. Its medical use has already been approved in 23 states, even as leading politicians begrudgingly admit its benefits.

As more states sign on for medical marijuana and local governments notice the revenue pulled from recreational weed — sales in Colorado are expected to reach $1 billion during this fiscal year — it’s likely to become a slippery slope toward the end of prohibition.  


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: authorondrigs; bsarticle; cannabis; decriminaledfraud; fraud; ibtz; legalizedfraud; libertarianagenda; marijuana; pot; retreadtroll; snakeoil; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last
To: ifinnegan; Opinionated Blowhard; jsanders2001
” I have seen no...”

It’s all about you.

Tell it to jsanders2001, who said in post #21, "And boy does it sure make the people I know that are on it apathetic and lazy."

41 posted on 08/20/2014 11:15:58 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Suppose YOU tell us why you think its OK for children to have unlimited access to free pot.

Funny, booze is legal and that does not give children access to free booze. Quite the strawman.

42 posted on 08/20/2014 11:16:47 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

duuuuuuddddeee mannnnnn... legalize it, man, and tax it, man...... wait wha???


43 posted on 08/20/2014 11:16:56 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
easy there - wipe that foam from around your mouth and take a breath.

First point to me where in the Constitution the feds have the right to dictate what we ingest?

If we needed a Constitutional amendment to ban alcohol where is the amendment that bans all the other stuff?

To your question - no I do not believe in removing all restrictions.

FDA like all other fed agencies should be advisory with few regulatory powers. In this age of readily-available information and super expensive healthcare we are being financially compelled into a self-education and self-treatment situation. Take note of the expanding international pharmacy commerce. But its going to be more of a caveat emptor situation where you better know what you are doing before self-treatment as you will be responsible for the damages. The FDA should certainly issue guidances and standards and be vigilant in monitoring and reporting on products and manufacturers. But their expansive regulatory tentacles know no bounds and are as damaging as they are benfiting the public interest.

In the meantime there is a growing public disdain for our coercive Federales and their Reefer Madness mentality. In November Florida has medical pot on the ballet - lets see where that goes.

44 posted on 08/20/2014 11:17:01 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
Was the author FR POSTER of this piece a blogger for a Soros’s funded community group by chance?

Fixed

45 posted on 08/20/2014 11:18:06 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Subjective. I’ll give the actual traits I’ve observed and you tell me - won’t take care of their house whether clean or maintaining it, disappears for hours then shows back up with lame eplanation, late to work, lounges around and watches TV all the time without offering to lend a hand when its obvious a little help would be nice, unable to keep jobs long term (some business owners that are self-employed and driven are exceptions but not many). That’s a short list...


46 posted on 08/20/2014 11:18:14 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
You know a pot smoker, you can see the effects.

And since it's illegal, the ones who don't show the effects are careful to not let on that they're pot smokers. That's one reason why the plural of anecdote is not "data."

47 posted on 08/20/2014 11:19:03 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Eva
The Black market for marijuana is still thriving.

Why? Taxes.

Ironic that a tax-reduction argument will soon be created for dope.

48 posted on 08/20/2014 11:20:19 AM PDT by polymuser ( Enough is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Maybe its just that the dumbest, laziest, slackers, and losers just tend to smoke MJ. Or maybe the MJ effects them and they begin to act that way.
I didn’t notice anything about the health effects on the lungs in this article.
All I know is that almost all of the people I have ever known who are long-term pot smokers are: poor, lazy, apathetic, slackers. Not all, but nearly all.


49 posted on 08/20/2014 11:20:30 AM PDT by vpintheak (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001; ifinnegan
Subjective. I’ll give the actual traits I’ve observed and you tell me

Ask ifinnegan - he said it.

50 posted on 08/20/2014 11:20:51 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

It may be a good thing, but it is still not eliminating the crime. Associated with the sale of marijuana., and as the incident in CA shows, it won’t stop the violence and the long sentences.


51 posted on 08/20/2014 11:21:33 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak
I didn’t notice anything about the health effects on the lungs in this article.

"Although smoking weed won’t mess with a person’s body too much, it can cause a couple of the same issues that tobacco smokers experience, with the most likely one being respiratory problems. Ailments like bronchitis may sometimes develop as users inhale the tars from the rolling papers in joints and blunts. Because of this, eating marijuana-infused foods or smoking from a vaporizer, which heats the weed up just enough to release the THC (its active ingredient), may be healthier.[...] Other opponents argue it can cause lung cancer, a condition not one study has found a link to yet."

52 posted on 08/20/2014 11:23:15 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

The only way they’ll prevent legalization of marijuana is to again criminalize alcohol. The hypocrisy is too great to keep it going otherwise. 10 years, tops, and marijuana is legal nationwide.


53 posted on 08/20/2014 11:24:25 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

in before Zot!


54 posted on 08/20/2014 11:24:26 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

It is not just taxes, it s price controls. In WA, legal marijuana is not cheap and they say that the State has created a two tier system, a legal one for the establishment types and the Black Market for the non-establishment types.


55 posted on 08/20/2014 11:25:07 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Eva
it is still not eliminating the crime.

That criminalization fed crime is enough for me.

Associated with the sale of marijuana., and as the incident in CA shows, it won’t stop the violence

Are robberies of liquor stores "violence associated with the sale of alcohol"? Are they a good argument against legal alcohol?

56 posted on 08/20/2014 11:25:38 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Eva

There’s a black market in illegal cigarettes too, so should we just make tobacco illegal across the board?


57 posted on 08/20/2014 11:26:11 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

You know some things are just so obvious to many that there’s really no need to defend or explain your statement


58 posted on 08/20/2014 11:26:25 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
To your question - no I do not believe in removing all restrictions.

Then perhaps you should take a stab at your own question.

just how it is that others should decide for us what toxins we decide to ingest?

FDA like all other fed agencies should be advisory with few regulatory powers.

So where do they get their regulatory powers?

The FDA should certainly issue guidances and standards

Standards that have to be met? or just suggestions? If really a standard to be met, where do they get their regulatory powers?

I think we agree on the need and appropriateness of drug regulation. I think we disagree on where the line should be drawn. But I read your first statement to mean there should be no line at all. I don't believe based upon your last response that is your belief. Let me know if I misunderstood.

59 posted on 08/20/2014 11:26:26 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Comparing marijuana to liquor is a non sequitur. I won’t even discuss that.


60 posted on 08/20/2014 11:27:21 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson