To: gorush
Actually, Romney was not clueless. In fact, he is rather sharp, but purists got in a snit and purists gave us four more years of Obama.
67 posted on
08/19/2014 5:13:41 PM PDT by
Dave W
To: Dave W
RomneyBOT: "Support RomneyCARE. Support our Master."
69 posted on
08/19/2014 5:15:35 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
To: Dave W
The article states that Romney didn’t think Obama would be this bad. That qualifies as clueless in my book.
72 posted on
08/19/2014 5:20:20 PM PDT by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: Dave W
We got in a snit in Florida because Mitt decided he did not have to campaign here. The biggest prize in the election and Mitt figured he could dial it in. According to Mitt’s campaign record in Florida, Newt Gingrich is the worse thing that could ever happen to the country. Obama, on the other hand, was in just a little over his head.
If Mitt didn’t feel it was necessary to show up to his own campaign, why did we?
74 posted on
08/19/2014 5:23:13 PM PDT by
Waryone
To: Dave W
Actually, Romney was not clueless. In fact, he is rather sharp, but purists got in a snit ... Those damned purists! Didn't they realize how important it was, the choice -- !!! Diet Decaf Coke, or Pepsi! DECIDE!!!!!
88 posted on
08/19/2014 11:47:21 PM PDT by
Finny
(Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson