Skip to comments.
Why Did They Burn Down The Quick Trip ? – And Other Ferguson Thug Behavior Questions Answered…
The Conservative Treehouse ^
| 8/18/14
| sundance
Posted on 08/18/2014 4:13:47 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: defconw
The concept of INVENTORY is lost on looters
21
posted on
08/18/2014 6:00:39 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods)
To: I want the USA back
22
posted on
08/18/2014 6:02:22 AM PDT
by
defconw
(Both parties have clearly lost their minds!)
To: goodnesswins
The concept of most things is lost on looters. I think we need to just laugh at progressives from now on. Just laugh at everything they say.
23
posted on
08/18/2014 6:06:04 AM PDT
by
defconw
(Both parties have clearly lost their minds!)
To: sheikdetailfeather
24
posted on
08/18/2014 6:13:20 AM PDT
by
Excellence
(Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
To: T-Bird45
***Same here in the Tulsa metro...***
Thirty nine year ago I was going north on Peoria to Sperry, I noticed a NEW large shopping center just north of APACHE st. on the west side of the road. It had everything a person needed in it, Spirits, fast food, Bellscott, and many other stores.
ONE year later I again went to Sperry an noticed this entire shopping center was abandoned, except for a liqueur store.
Noe Peoria, south of 44 is getting just as bad.
25
posted on
08/18/2014 6:17:01 AM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
To: defconw
It is outrageous that in some urban communities thugs have to travel 10 miles or more just to steal healthy cigars.
To: T-Bird45
***For anybody who can't wrap their mind around being ripped off by a community***
We had a large contingent of Katrina refugees her about 9 years ago. For the first time in our history Walmart had to go on Lockdown as so many of them were trying to steal the place blind.
The Katrina camp had to bring in guards for the gates. It was said it was to protect the refugees but it was really to suppress internal crime brought in by the refugees.
27
posted on
08/18/2014 6:21:26 AM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
To: Junk Silver
Shall we have a rally? I mean the nerve of those greedy shop owners not rebuilding! So now the boys in the hood have to carjack their way to the burbs to steal cigars. I’ll tell you it just burns me up! /s
28
posted on
08/18/2014 6:22:26 AM PDT
by
defconw
(Both parties have clearly lost their minds!)
To: sheikdetailfeather
29
posted on
08/18/2014 6:23:54 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
( Looted store owners in Ferguson should to sue the city. They paid for police protection - got none)
To: Junk Silver
How soon are we going to hear of the scourge of “crime victim desert”,
where perps have to travel great distances to find people worth robbing?
30
posted on
08/18/2014 6:25:34 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: liberalh8ter
Hahahahha! Post of the day!
31
posted on
08/18/2014 6:25:47 AM PDT
by
Ray76
(True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
To: Sir Napsalot
Yep..the DOJ bussed in protestors to Sanford, Florida.
32
posted on
08/18/2014 6:26:50 AM PDT
by
sheikdetailfeather
("The Border Is On Fire & Washington Is Sending Us Gasoline" AZ Ranchers John Ladd & Fred Davis 7/14)
To: WildHighlander57
-——niggas protesting nshit-——
So, is this an acceptable spelling of the n word ending in er that is forbidden? It seems to be in common usage
33
posted on
08/18/2014 6:32:08 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
To: sheikdetailfeather
My question (”why the looting? why the _two_ stores in particular?”) is now answered (”retribution”).
34
posted on
08/18/2014 6:43:15 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun" - Obama, setting RoE with his opposition)
To: sheikdetailfeather
I’m wondering whether that video with the background conversations will be admissible in any future trial. And of course there will have to be a trial. With the same sort of witnesses etc that we had in the Zimmerman trial.
35
posted on
08/18/2014 6:43:40 AM PDT
by
Mercat
To: sheikdetailfeather
Obama will now sue because the neighborhood is a “food desert” or whatever.
36
posted on
08/18/2014 6:58:07 AM PDT
by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
To: Mercat
I think 2 things:
1. Police/FBI will find the anonymous talker and ultimately get him to testify via the usual police methods/pressure.
2. The video can be admitted based upon the testimony of the guy that took it.
Caveat: I’m not a lawyer.
37
posted on
08/18/2014 7:02:22 AM PDT
by
Cen-Tejas
(it's the debt bomb stupid!)
To: sheikdetailfeather
The man in that video is unintelligible.
38
posted on
08/18/2014 7:48:26 AM PDT
by
RobinOfKingston
(Democrats--the party of Evil. Republicans--the party of Stupid.)
To: All
39
posted on
08/18/2014 8:02:40 AM PDT
by
sheikdetailfeather
("The Border Is On Fire & Washington Is Sending Us Gasoline" AZ Ranchers John Ladd & Fred Davis 7/14)
To: sheikdetailfeather
40
posted on
08/18/2014 8:07:24 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun" - Obama, setting RoE with his opposition)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson