Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wyatt's Torch
companies that have done such “inversion” deals have failed to produce above-average returns for investors, a Reuters analysis has found

That's the new "taxes-are-good-for-you" meme going around, saw it the other day here: Tax Inversions Are Bad for Shareholders - Chuck Jaffe, MarketWatch.   Apparently there's big money for journalists who urge investors to pour their money into companies that are being fleeced by high taxes.  In the mean time this anti business frenzy kicked up against Walgreens got so bad that when they finally caved (under who-knows what kind of duress from the exec. dept.)--

--stockholders got robbed of $ten billion in one day.   Controls to prevent people fleeing with their possessions don't work.  Despots can either allow capital flight or they end up destroying capital altogether.

7 posted on 08/18/2014 7:07:19 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: expat_panama
The Elon Musk ETF:


9 posted on 08/18/2014 8:08:32 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: expat_panama

It was Chicago making the offer. How could Walgreen’s refuse?

Those studies on inversions/taxes are garbage. How can low taxes hurt a company? I suspect cherry picked dates and companies.


45 posted on 08/20/2014 5:49:00 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson