You mean the choke hold that they outlawed 20 years ago — the same the one the cop used last month — the same one that they are outlawing again for a 2nd time.
A) MSNBC
B) Southern Poverty Law Center
C) NAACP
D) some acronym as a Community Organizer
or
E) Some university as an adjunct professor degreed in the new profession of Social Justice or White Privilege
Yup.
Found to have a higher incidence of fatality when applied to Blacks than Whites. . .something physiological, so it was deemed ‘racist’ and banned.
Now instead of a simple choke hold to subdue quickly, and 99% of the time not lethal, now police have to use batons to beat the guy or ‘swarm’ the guy (resulting in alleged smothering), or tazering (causing fatalities and injurious when the criminal smack’s face first into the concrete).
Point is, choke hold was less lethal and caused less harm than the ‘replacement’ protocols.
How does one physically subdue a criminal without running a risk of hurting the guy? Answer: there is no method that is 100% injury free or risk free.