Posted on 08/12/2014 10:37:08 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
Edited on 08/12/2014 10:47:11 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
During a private meeting, President Obama reportedly called criticisms of his Syria policy [edited].p>
Hillary Clinton and a number of members of Congress have said Obama could have done more to help Syrian rebels, including giving them weapons. The Daily Beast reports that Obama responded to the bipartisan criticism, arguing the notion that providing weapons to rebels sooner would have helped Syria is complete [edited].
Let the games begin.
There were no “good” players in that mess. And it is horseshit for Hillary to try to distance herself from all the crap on her own feet.
Why would Hillary want to help the Syrian rebels, knowing what we know today. They are now ISIS, if I’m not mistaken. So she would have helped ISIS more.
The Clintons have been p*ssed since the Chicago mob rolled out a guy from Kenya named Hussein and stole the kiskha in 2008.
They see a similar approach in 2016 with Lizzie Warren.
Let the infighting begin....
... straight from the horse’s ass.....
I actually agree with Bammy on this one but maybe for different reasons. Aren’t the Syrian rebels now connected up with ISIS? He stupidly armed the Libyan rebels and look whats happened there? Other than the Kurds arming any other muzzie rebels is a crap shoot at best.
Nothing happens in DC by accident, and especially anything the Democrats do.
Id love to have the audio evidence on this one...
someone surely has it
Obama is pooping on Hillary’s chances ???
Isn’t this the same group McCain got photographed with, and then he, Obama and Grahmnesty said we should have supported with air power? If so, why? I know why Obama supports the caliphate, but McCain and Grahamnesty?
May be the first time in history where the policy and the criticism of the policy are accurately described with one word. Also applies equally to the libtard protagonists...
Hillary Clinton and a number of members of Congress have said Obama could have done more to help Syrian rebels, including giving them weapons.
Why do we want to help the Syrian rebels? It’s not the Syrian army that is causing the terror in Mosul or in Iraq. It’s the rebels (TERRORISTS).
Under Assad, Syria was one of the few places in the middle east where Christians were protected. he may be a bad guy but the “rebels” are far worse.
Obama, Hillary, and McCain had us on the wrong side. We were supporting terrorists.
Yes, it is the same group...which no one in the media wants to drag out the picture and mention that. Wonder why?
I think everyone in the administration and in the background of DC politics was ALL for arming ISIS around eighteen months ago. After Benghazi....I think that enthusiasm drifted off and people started to ask stupid questions.
You should note this....the Saudi royal family really pumped up the help for ISIS until they headed across into Iraq. It ought to beg for questions about what they knew of the guys in ISIS.
3 removed comments in the first 12. Is that a record?
Exactly, when are sheeple going to stop falling for this dem/hollywood contrived horsesh#t?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.