To: fwdude
An unarmed person (35 feet away) CAN STILL POSE A THREAT!!!
17 posted on
08/12/2014 9:43:45 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Jack Hydrazine
An unarmed person (35 feet away) CAN STILL POSE A THREAT!!! Did I miss the </sarcasm> tag on that post?
To: Jack Hydrazine
I didn’t say that in this instance the officer is blameless.
I said that the continuing “unarmed” meme is a falsehood that is continually disseminated by the press. People with criminal intent ARE ARMED. Sounds like this Brown fellow didn’t have this intent.
25 posted on
08/12/2014 9:49:54 AM PDT by
fwdude
(The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
To: Jack Hydrazine
A threat, perhaps, but at 35’ the threat is not life threatening since he is unarmed. It does not merit deadly force unless the threat moves closer, to about 20’.
45 posted on
08/12/2014 9:59:37 AM PDT by
expat2
To: Jack Hydrazine
"An unarmed person (35 feet away) CAN STILL POSE A THREAT!!!"
How, and is the threat immediate?
60 posted on
08/12/2014 10:16:32 AM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Jack Hydrazine
“An unarmed person (35 feet away) CAN STILL POSE A THREAT!!!”
BS...
64 posted on
08/12/2014 10:21:32 AM PDT by
babygene
( .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson