Skip to comments.
Three Congressmen Are Using Red Tape to Bind SpaceX to Earth
Slate.com ^
| 12AUG2014
| Phil Plait
Posted on 08/12/2014 9:02:42 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
Hey, remember Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the guy who threw needless layers of bureaucracy at SpaceX because the private space company was doing its job of launching rockets into space a little too well? Well, it looks like hes being joined by gentlemen from the other side of the Capitol: Three congressmen are trying to do the same thing.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama; US: Colorado; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: alabama; colorado; corygardner; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; falseflagfreepers; mikecoffman; mobrooks; nasa; paultardation; paultards; philplait; putinsbuttboys; richardshelby; spaceexploration; spacex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Jack Hydrazine
I’ve been waiting for this to happen and now it has.
2
posted on
08/12/2014 9:03:06 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Jack Hydrazine
corruption? They probably trying to protect another company from competition
3
posted on
08/12/2014 9:06:24 AM PDT
by
4rcane
To: Jack Hydrazine
SpaceX must not be “lobbying” well enough.
4
posted on
08/12/2014 9:08:55 AM PDT
by
glorgau
To: Jack Hydrazine
Imagine 100 years ago if Congress had similarly meddled with the fledgeling auto industry... we would still be driving around in horse and buggies.
To: The Great RJ
6
posted on
08/12/2014 9:10:46 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: 4rcane
Redstone Arsenal and its suppliers/contractors?
To: Jack Hydrazine
They don’t have enough queers, muslims, and minorities to make them diversity worthy to compete with NASA.
To: Jack Hydrazine
There ought to be a law against politically harassing a particular business to benefit another who donates to the harasser’s campaign. Heh, there probably is but it’s not enforced. And all republicans to boot. [Push a button and vaporize the lot, you say?]
9
posted on
08/12/2014 9:22:25 AM PDT
by
W.
(LBJ, edited: 'I'll have 'em riotin', lootin' and votin' dem0crat for the next 100 years!--Sarc?)
To: glorgau
I would reckon Space-X will have to relocate to the Moon to rid them selves of the political bureaucracy! Sad to see 4 -R’s behind the names as success seems to lurk on the Horizon! I guess funding is needed for an Alabama space port??????
10
posted on
08/12/2014 9:24:41 AM PDT
by
DocJhn
To: 4rcane
Yep, you can bet that there is money tied to this that can be traced back to the politicians.
11
posted on
08/12/2014 9:27:11 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: Jack Hydrazine
Take my love
Take my land
Take me where I cannot stand.
I don’t care
I’m still free
You can’t take the sky from me!
~Firefly
12
posted on
08/12/2014 9:30:47 AM PDT
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("Scheming demons dressed in kingly guise, beating down the multitudes and scoffing at the wise.")
To: Resolute Conservative
Exactly the case. SpaceX and Virgin Galactic aren’t feel good federal jobs programs. They are private industry that will embarrass NASA. How does SpaceX make muslims feel good about themselves if it isn’t their number one objective?
All contributions are for the current quarter expenses.
FReepathon day 42.
Two percent a day keeps the 404 away.
14
posted on
08/12/2014 9:50:44 AM PDT
by
RedMDer
(May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
To: Jack Hydrazine
Thats why this whole thing looks to me to be a transparent attempt from members of our Congress to hinder a privately owned company that threatens their own interests. Ill note that Boeing (the major SLS contractor) has a big plant in Alabama, Brooks (and Shelbys) home state, and United Launch Alliance has its HQ in Colorado, home to Gardner and Coffman (its even in Coffmans district). This sounds more like theyre trying to protect their own turf more than honestly wanting transparency from SpaceX. FedGov doing what it does best; political payoffs and paybacks.
15
posted on
08/12/2014 10:36:46 AM PDT
by
Flick Lives
("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
To: Jack Hydrazine
16
posted on
08/12/2014 10:57:02 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: Resolute Conservative
They dont have enough queers, muslims, and minorities to make them diversity worthy to compete with NASA. Read the story. They weren't building their rockets in Alabama. That was their big crime.
To: Jack Hydrazine
Poor little Elon -- $800 million in federal grants and subsidies over the last decade and its just not enough. Doesn't Congress realize that Musk is one of Obama's biggest political contributors? How dare they require that SpaceX comply with federal acquisition regulations that all other companies have to deal with?
Once we sent people to the Moon. Now, we are supporting Obama's crony capitalist wealth transfer program. That's progress for you.
18
posted on
08/12/2014 11:10:19 AM PDT
by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
To: Cincinatus
Don’t worry. Obama will save him!
19
posted on
08/12/2014 11:22:31 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: W.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson