What about their dimes? You know, the ones they paid in. Now you don’t want to give them back when their lifestyle choice is one you disapprove of.
So you support taking their money at gunpoint to pay for your care but don’t want to give them the same courtesy. That my friend is thievery any way you slice it.
I notice that you're again dishonest about this. It isn't a lifestyle choice I approve of or disapprove of I couldn't care less if you smoke or not. It is a known fact that smoking increases health risks in a number of categories and increases occurrence of diseases such as lung cancer and emphysema. Smoking is a voluntary activity. No one puts a gun to your haead and says SMOKE! So logically A major premise you know smoking increses your risk of disease, and minor premise B smoking is voluntary conclusion C. You are voluntarily putting yourself at risk assuming a greater chance of disease.
Now as to giving your money back. The government has already spent it. However, I think that smokers should be opted out of the system on a going forward basis. Not pay any more in and not get any government funds when and if they come down with lung cancer.
I also notice neithe you nor the other socialist who wants other people to pay for voluntary risk related health issues has answered my question as to whether or not you think AIDS treatments should be government funded.