Posted on 08/10/2014 6:12:39 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
WASHINGTON—Days before the takeover of the Iraqi city of Mosul by the militant group calling itself the Islamic State, U.S. intelligence analysts were sharply divided over whether the group would seize the city, according to people familiar with the debate.
Although U.S. spy agencies have monitored and warned about the Islamic State over the past year, they often have underestimated the group's ability to make rapid operational gains, U.S. officials said. That was the case a week ago when militants launched a dramatic and successful offensive in Iraq's Kurdish region.
The inability of U.S. spy agencies to provide details about the timing of Islamic State offensives or their likelihood of success has touched off debate among U.S. national-security officials about whether intelligence on the group has been adequate.
The struggle to understand the capabilities of the group reflects the difficulty of collecting detailed intelligence on its internal planning. "Collection is tough," one senior U.S. official acknowledged.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
BS....ignored just like intelligence on Boston Bombers
Missed it?
Or was it “willfully ignored it out of political expediency, hoping it will go away”?
And what religion does the head of the CIA practice, hmmmmmm?
Thrown under the bus by their BOSS..!
How much LONGER will they be willing to play dumb, giggly SHOE SHINE BOY to this turd..?
lack of human intelligence and electronic intercepts was a problem prior to 9/11, but was 100% fixed when bunnypants took office.
it’s something else he broke. next thing you know, the massive dumbass is going to misplace one of the Dakotas.
Do we really need a CIA? Just look at the track record.
“analysts sharply divided” = Half knew what they saw and half knew what the boss wanted to hear.
The intelligence community let him down, didn’t do its job.
That’s why he had to learn about ISIS by reading the newspaper, just like everyone else.
The chief US Spy is a Muzie pig.
I think the word here is “disingenuous”. Of course they knew. Everyone knew that the “good guys” were quickly pushed out of the rebellion against Assad and replaced by these creeps who were most interested in slaughtering minorities, particularly Christians. At least anyone who read FR was advised of this sad truth.
Freepers have been watching.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3127798/posts
Whether they could or not isn’t the action line...
When they were positioned and had intent was the time to act, if action is within the policy.
“We knew they were going to attack but didn’t think they could win so we sat back and did nothing. Oops my bad.”
Policy drives intelligence requirements!
If the requirement said.. can they win the city... the requirement is at fault. The requirement should be intentions, position, and capabilities. Requiring a prediction on results of the action specifies a reactive policy. We only.. if they. Too much room for catastrophic error. Amateurs in charge.
“BS....ignored just like intelligence on Boston Bombers”
Yea your right.
How did our spy satellites miss all that brand new truck and equipment buildup?
Missed it, didn’t miss it just ignored it, or maybe even some of that $6 billion missing from Hillary’s state dept, paid for it.
When the CIA missed the implosion of the Soviet Union, it was evident that they didn’t know what was going on in the USSR Then came the failure to prevent 9/11. After that, the attack on our embassy in Benghazi. And the invasion of our country by illegals since October of last year. These failures do not inspire confidence.
Overseas intelligence gathering has been seriously failing in the past few years. The question is why?
1. There are no more human spies.
2. Relying only on internet intercepts
3. Allied nation’s intelligence agencies share on a very limited basis as they no longer trust the CIA, or other US spy agencies because of trust issues.
4. The US collects the right data but discounts it as unimportant.
5. The White House suppresses ME intelligence because of pro-Islamist bias.
6. All US intelligence gathering agencies are immersed in political correctness.
They’re all out there looking for the ‘conservative lone wolf’....
Maybe it should be called C.Y.A. (Central Yadayada Agency).
For a number of years now I’ve been of the opinion that Able Danger was shut down because it inadvertently uncovered operations that weren’t supposed to be...particularly by those without clearance...those ‘outside the circle’.
I still believe Eisenhower had it right. The rest of it is rife with conjecture, opinion & conspiracy. But the more time that goes by...the more the outcome fits the plot and the more it’s clear that when ‘they’ say “intelligence failure” I hear “it’s exactly what we expected and now you’re going to do what we want”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.