Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grania

Perry did give in state tuition to illegals.

Probably still does, I’m not looking it up now, it’s likely not publicized.

I know people who spent decades in the military, retired there, then established texas state residency, and couldn’t get in state rates for their kids’ college for years.

Illegals got instant in state rates.

Perry.

I don’t know what other probably myriad bennies he gave or continues to give illegals but this is Perry.

He has done what to stem this invasion into his state?

Talked about getting the National Guard here.

Rand Paul is not any stitch better not a bit better.

None of them are The GOP loves illegals.

they could have done something about them. They could have beaten Obama if they’d wanted to.

Forty years after Roe V Wade, they still run on a pro life message, collecting money on promises to do something about abortion, for which everyone pays.

Nothing

Forty years? They wouldn’t know what to do without abortion.

They are horrible.

But Paul is included


45 posted on 08/06/2014 7:16:06 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: stanne
But (Rand) Paul is included

He's all over the place. Maybe he spent too much time in DC growing up as a rep's son to have a moral compass. Who knows what it is?

What we see is that he's all over the place. Besides that, there are two real good points Ron Paul makes. They are the damage the Federal Reserve has done and our over-reaching destructive foreign policy. Rand Paul hasn't said anything that leads me to think he supports those views.

I wish sanity could prevail. That would be Jeff Sessions as President. He has become more vocal recently. He's the one who has a solid record of getting to DC and keeping, spreading, and strengthening constitutional conservative viewpoints. (a gal can dream, can't she?)

52 posted on 08/06/2014 7:29:21 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: stanne

It isn’t totally inactive on abortion. Rand Paul doesn’t agree with the pro-life platform though.

“On January 22, thousands gathered on the National Mall in Washington for the annual March for Life that takes place on the date that Roe v. Wade was decided by the Supreme Court.

The same week, the Republican National Committee decided that it was time for the national party to wade back into the pro-life waters after a perceived hiatus from using it as a platform issue. A “Resolution on Republican Pro-Life Strategy” formally re-established abortion as a 2014 election issue for the party and seeks to push back on the “war on women” rhetoric that Democrats have made synonymous with the pro-life movement.

The RNC clearly believes once again that a prominent pro-life position plays well with voters. Perhaps the national party has taken note of what’s happening at the state level. Twenty-four states enacted 53 anti-abortion measures in 2013 alone.

Research from the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute shows that in the last three years, states have enacted an unprecedented 205 different abortion restrictions. This was made possible by the fact that over half of the states in the union have pro-life governors and pro-life majorities in their legislatures.”


70 posted on 08/06/2014 8:52:27 AM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson