Skip to comments.
New York patient ‘unlikely to have Ebola,’ Health Department says
Washington Post ^
| 08/04/2014
| By Elahe Izadi
Posted on 08/04/2014 7:09:01 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: SeekAndFind
Very comforting to a city of millions..tightly packed in close proximity to one another....what could go wrong?
21
posted on
08/05/2014 1:37:34 AM PDT
by
antceecee
(Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
To: BuckeyeTexan
“
It will take 1-2 days for the results to come back. Evidently, there have been six (or so) cases recently where an individual has returned here from an Ebola-stricken West African country with symptoms consistent with Ebola, but none of them had Ebola. “
Considering that False Negatives seems common, do we know about these ‘none who had Ebola’ : were they tested a second time for Ebola, and was what they did actually have confirmed ?
22
posted on
08/05/2014 1:54:17 AM PDT
by
PraiseTheLord
(have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
To: antceecee
"An Ebola vaccine “would be very helpful,” he said, but it won’t exist anytime soon. Still, he added, health workers can find and isolate patients, trace the contacts they’ve made and
encourage safe burial practices for those who fall ill." CDC: U.S. can't seal borders to stop Ebola
To: SeekAndFind
Can we believe anything told us by the government without independent verification? Would they suppress any report of Ebola loose in the population, if they could? For that matter, how many disease reports from the illegal alien processing facilities are already being suppressed so they can transport the vectors all over the US?
24
posted on
08/05/2014 3:08:07 AM PDT
by
Truth29
To: Truth29
DON'T TRUST, VERIFY
25
posted on
08/05/2014 5:29:01 AM PDT
by
SeekAndFind
(If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
To: BuckeyeTexan
What ever happened to the rapid response tests they’re using in W. Africa?
26
posted on
08/05/2014 7:01:22 AM PDT
by
Raebie
To: Chgogal
Crap, there is no need to have any tests because it's "unlikely" that the man may have Ebola. It would have been nice if they gave us facts why the city's health department deems it "unlikely". Who needs facts when there is consensus among pundits?
27
posted on
08/05/2014 7:12:50 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(CNN suppressed news to maintain their Baghdad bureau under Saddam; they just did the same for Hamas.)
To: PraiseTheLord
28
posted on
08/05/2014 8:13:05 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: PraiseTheLord
29
posted on
08/05/2014 8:15:37 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: Truth29
Would they suppress any report of Ebola loose in the population, if they could? Of course - to prevent panic.
30
posted on
08/05/2014 8:30:20 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: Raebie
If I had to guess, I would say those tests are not readily available in the US because we don’t have Ebola outbreaks. It’s a good question.
31
posted on
08/05/2014 8:34:54 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson