[Innovative]

“I’d rather lose that seat “ .. what if that seat makes the difference between R or D control?

[dirtboy]

Then so be it. It is far more important that the GOP-E’s actions in the Mississippi runoff not bear fruit, lest we see them repeated against Tea Party candidates in later elections. It should have been a safe seat for the GOP if McDaniels had won the runoff in a fair fight. If the seat is lost, blame the GOP-E, not the Tea Party.

[Flintlock]

That thinking got us Arlan Spector.

[Hostage]

There is R-E and R-TP, and then there is D.

THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN R-E AND D.

This is R-TP v. R-E & D; the country class v. the ruling class; conservatives v. the self-anointed aristocracy.

When you catch up to these facts and this reality, then post away. Until then, find yourself a site that attracts like-minded lower order miscreants and trolls. Here, for example:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

[Carry_Okie]

“I’d rather lose that seat “ .. what if that seat makes the difference between R or D control?

Can you say "Jumping Jim Jeffords"? That's what happens. The RINOs would rather support a Democrat agenda to keep the K-Street Kapital flowing than to adhere to the principles of their own party platform.

[urbanpovertylawcenter]

there is no difference between D and Gop-e, so to vote only conservatives or not at all makes no difference.

The senate will remain D even if GOP-e takes over and the house will remain GOP-e.

And Obama ain't going nowhere.

[Mariner]

"what if that seat makes the difference between R or D control"

First, destroy the GOP.

Then we can figure out how to defeat the communists with what's left.

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

“I’d rather lose that seat “ .. what if that seat makes the difference between R or D control?

---

Election fraud has consequences.