Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Mitt Romney is perfectly poised for a comeback in 2016
The Week ^ | July 31, 2014 | Matt K. Lewis

Posted on 07/31/2014 7:42:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Nobody has ever rooted for that scrappy Romney kid to overcome the odds. Until, maybe, now.

Perhaps it says something about us that our most interesting presidential candidates swear they won't run for president. This is true of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and it's increasingly true of Mitt Romney.

As regular readers of this column know, I've never been much of a Romney booster. I've also expressed skepticism about the notion he would run again. But let's not let "a foolish consistency" cloud our judgment. There is reason to believe that a third try wouldn't be an absurd venture.

First, in the intervening years since 2012 — and on a range of issues, not the least of which is Russia — Romney has been proven right. And second — perhaps more important — one of the reasons so many observers viscerally disliked Romney was the cloying "goody-goody" quality that this fortunate son seemed to ooze. But do you know what the cure for that is? Losing.

That's right, Mitt Romney the scrappy underdog — the loser who's out to redeem himself — is a more attractive Mitt.

You know the term "lovable loser?" He should embrace it.

There's a reason why Rocky gets knocked out by "Clubber" Lang early on in Rocky III. The rest of the movie is about the comeback. This journey involves Rocky shedding the trappings of fame and wealth — and getting real.

Romney would similarly have to get real. No more phoniness. No more telling us what he thinks we want to hear. He would have to be utterly authentic, and he would have to show that losing caused him to encounter pain and reflection. (The good news is that the Netflix film, Mitt, already helped show this side of Romney.)

Could Romney III be like Rocky III? Maybe, if the narrative is true and convincing.

There's a reason the "comeback" trope resonates with us (aside from Rocky, it's a prevalent theme in almost every boxing movie, ranging from The Fighter to Cinderella Man). These tropes are timeless precisely because they tap into something that we intuitively understand about nobility, courage, and humility.

People like comebacks. We can identify with the guy or gal who is struggling to redeem themselves (and nobody has ever identified with Mitt Romney before).

Ironically, Romney is almost tailor-made to benefit from having lost before. What might be a devastating blow to most political figures — a blight on their résumé — actually transforms Romney into a more compelling candidate. Having struggled and stumbled is, for Romney, at least, a feature, not a bug. The same could be said for Hillary Clinton, who only became a compelling candidate in 2008 when she lost her front-runner status.

People who were hated the first time around — when their lives seemed charmed — can, by facing adversity and overcoming the odds, transform into sympathetic figures — heroes, even — that we actually root for (think: Robert Downey Jr.). Nobody has ever rooted for that scrappy Romney kid to overcome the odds. Until, maybe, now.

Someone who knows a thing or two about comebacks is Pat Buchanan. In fact, his new book is called The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.

During a recent discussion, I asked Buchanan about the prospects of Romney taking a page from the Nixon playbook. After all, George Romney figures prominently in the Nixon comeback story. "First, I admire that Romney is thinking of this," Buchanan told me during a recent podcast discussion, "and he ought to follow what's in his heart."

Buchanan, whose sister was a Romney adviser, believes that Romney should take a page from the Nixon handbook. Having lost to Kennedy in 1960, and then having lost the 1962 gubernatorial election in California, Nixon was assumed politically dead. But he was revived by working hard for other candidates — he worked hard for conservative Barry Goldwater in 1964 and backed liberal Republican Nelson Rockefeller's candidacy in New York — just to name two of the many GOPers he hit the hustings for between 1962 and 1968.

"If I were Romney, there's no doubt I would do it," Buchanan (who thrice ran for president, himself) continued, adding, "But I'm not him."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Michigan; US: Mississippi; US: New York; US: Texas; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: 2016gopprimary; romney; romney2016; romneyagenda; romneycare; romneymarriage; romneypolygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Who do ya spose would give Cruz or Perry a kind ear?
Obama or Romney?


101 posted on 07/31/2014 11:03:33 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just go away, Mittens . . . go away.


102 posted on 07/31/2014 11:15:41 PM PDT by Skybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He couldn’t pick an effective campaign staff. Pretty serious flaw.


103 posted on 07/31/2014 11:20:14 PM PDT by garjog (Obama: bringing joy to the hearts of Terrorists everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I think we have given Away a huge advantage. Willard was not perfect, no man is.

But We gave ahole boy the catbird seat by fighting amongst ourselves,he walked right in and gutted the system.

Top to bottom.


104 posted on 07/31/2014 11:23:02 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Does anyone here think Ted Cruz would be getting the flak he is getting if Romney was in the executive office?

Being the Progressive Liberal that Romney has been and still is, and given his support for Abortion/the Gay Agenda, Amnesty, etc., can there be any doubt that from the GOP-E side Cruz would be getting hammered even more than he is currently right now and that Mitt Romney would be leading the charge against Cruz?
105 posted on 07/31/2014 11:25:49 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: mylife
But We gave ahole boy the catbird seat by fighting amongst ourselves,he walked right in and gutted the system.

Whose this "we" Kimasabe?

Mitt Romney, all by his feckless self, by supporting Abortion, the Gay Agenda, by not fighting Obama, by not articulating anything even remotely like limited government, blew that election all by himself.

As I said all along about Mr. Inevitable, the only thing Inevitable about Romney was that he was the only GOP candidate guaranteed to lose against a Democrat because his past and current positions were the closest to the Democrat positions on the issues.
106 posted on 07/31/2014 11:28:59 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Wasn’t me Kemosabi, I voted.


107 posted on 07/31/2014 11:31:59 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Wasn’t me Kemosabi, I voted.


108 posted on 07/31/2014 11:34:38 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Wasn’t me Kemosabi, I voted.

So did I Sherlock. But I didn't vote for any candidate that supported either the murder of unborn children or faggotry.

I found a candidate who was an actual conservative and supported none of the evil that either Romney or Obama supported.
109 posted on 07/31/2014 11:34:44 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

God Save the Republic.

Keep yer power dry.


110 posted on 07/31/2014 11:36:04 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

So who did you vote for? Pat Paulson?


111 posted on 07/31/2014 11:37:53 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I’m gonna say this about that, Governorship does not come by being polarized.

That is not a judgment on governorship, its just an observation about life.

half of the aholes are with ya and half are aginst ya.

Tough job to fill.


112 posted on 07/31/2014 11:43:14 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
"You guys are gonna run out of ammo trying to shoot down all of Mitts Trial Balloons."

New to Romney are you? You have no idea how much information freerepublic has on Mitt Romney's crazy liberalism.

We have years of information and exposure of him.

113 posted on 07/31/2014 11:47:11 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I’m gonna say this about that, Governorship does not come by being polarized. That is not a judgment on governorship, its just an observation about life. half of the aholes are with ya and half are aginst ya. Tough job to fill.

Romney didn't do well in the job, he failed and left with 34% approval after his own polling convinced him to give up hopes of reelection.

114 posted on 07/31/2014 11:49:36 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

Any man that becomes king of the hill will have rocks thrown at him.

It’s the nature of the beast,but we understand right from wrong.

Obama was the wrong choice, regardless of affirmative voting or sitting at home on yer thumb.

Lets chunk rocks at Obama.


115 posted on 07/31/2014 11:53:32 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
BUT he will have to become more real—authentic—Reaganesque-—

Romney is the anti-Reaganesque, in fact he left the party and as he says, he wasn't for Reagan/Bush during the 1980s.

Romney eventually became a democrat supporter and fund raiser, and voter, not returning to the GOP until Reagan/Bush were finished in 1992.

Mitt Romney rejoined the GOP in October of 1993.

116 posted on 07/31/2014 11:53:59 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

How’s Obama working out for you?


117 posted on 07/31/2014 11:54:54 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: mylife

As good for me as he is for you, it is the primary reason that you do not try to get republican candidates that republicans won’t vote for.

How did pushing Romney work out for you? And why are you doing it again?


118 posted on 07/31/2014 11:58:48 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I’m not pushing him, I only am pointing out that we made mistake digging our heals in.


119 posted on 08/01/2014 12:05:26 AM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Hey Ansell I voted for Ted Cruz 3 times to get him where he is


120 posted on 08/01/2014 12:07:33 AM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson