[fwdude]

I don’t understand how a federal court can rule against this, when a Supreme Court case has already upheld voter I.D. laws. What is this other than a rogue court?

[longtermmemmory]

judges have a severe tendency to egomania.

For example, when a ussc judge is asked about “repecting stare decisis” (prior cases); nominees give a meaningless yes. meaningless because the USSC is the one court that can TOTALY IGNORE prior cases.

Judges will make a rogue ruling because the KNOW not everyone can afford the whithering expense of an appeal. Appeals drag on and consume and destroy lives, bankrupt the innocent, and foster slap suits.

[InterceptPoint]

I don’t understand how a federal court can rule against this, when a Supreme Court case has already upheld voter I.D. laws. What is this other than a rogue court?
++++
Good question. We are rapidly approaching the complete politicization of the Judiciary. Three Branches Good, Two Branches Better - to coin, or steal, a phrase.

Wait until we get to One Branch Nirvana. That will be something to see - or to run from.

[afraidfortherepublic]

Judge Lynn Adelman of the United States District Court for Wisconsin's eastern district said the law clashed with the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Adelman is a hack Dem pol who was appointed to the court in a move to get him out of the legislature so that the legislature could approve taxing communities to build the retractible domed Milwaukee Brewer's stadium. He has been a pain in the (you know what) ever since with his controversial rulings. LouD, do you have anything to add to that.

[Durus]

The Federal court in this case upheld the law they didn’t rule against it.