To: ClaytonP
9 posted on
07/30/2014 6:37:26 PM PDT by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war,and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
To: DJ Taylor
17 posted on
07/30/2014 6:48:21 PM PDT by
ClaytonP
To: DJ Taylor
.
Thanks !!!!
I expected some mild "quasi-technical" MSM infobabe interview ... with lots of ridiculous questions ...
Instead ... a "genuine" air combat expert "devastates" the F35 ... mismatched for every one of it's six or seven mission profiles ...
and guaranteed to "kill" U.S. pilots by the hundreds.
.
To: DJ Taylor
Great link, DJ. Was very uneasy with the F 22/F 35 rationale. I was always unimpressed by stealth. This "seagull X-section" stuff is hogwash. Totally mystified by what's supposed to come after the F 15, F 18, F-16, A-10, especially since the new stuff doesn't look all that much of a leap forward.
It's OK for me to mystified, because that does not cost a lot of money. What ain't OK, if Pierre is to be believed, is that those whom the whimsical gods hath placed above us in the food chain are also mystified to the tune of many many billions..
35 posted on
07/30/2014 8:25:44 PM PDT by
Kenny Bunk
(The GOP is dying. What do we do now?)
To: DJ Taylor
A friend said the F-35 was a “grape”. You squeeze it twice and it’s all out of juice. The F-105 was a better strike fighter.
36 posted on
07/30/2014 9:27:03 PM PDT by
gura
(If Allah is so great, why does he need fat sexually confused fanboys to do his dirty work? -iowahawk)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson