“The plaintiffs (Palmer et al) also get a chance to file a motion as to why a stay pending appeal is a no go.”
Per post #6 above, Palmer et al need point out to the judge that “gay rights” gets a ruling in their favor and the verdict’s effect is immediate and final ... so of course an enumerated right should in no way be subject to a “stay”. The verdict was clear...and a right delayed is a right denied.
It’s ridiculous the amount of time it took to decide this case in the first place. Almost 5 years!!!!