Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pentagon Overpays for Almost Everything—Even Prescription Drugs
Business ^ | July 28th, 2014 | Kenny

Posted on 07/28/2014 11:11:22 AM PDT by MadIsh32

Britain’s Farnborough Air Show wrapped up last week after seven ear-splitting days. To impress the excited kids and jaded dealers in attendance, the U.S. sent an F-8, an F-15, and a pair of F-16s. But the much anticipated F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter was a no-show. After a runway fire grounded the fleet earlier this month, the Department of Defense suspended negotiations to purchase the next batch of the planes.

The troubled fighter is only the latest in a growing number of cases where the DOD has bought poorly designed and massively overpriced equipment for the nation’s armed forces. The average major Pentagon acquisition comes in at 40 percent over budget, according to a recent report from the Government Accountability Office. In spite of the Pentagon’s well-documented history of profligacy, the Congress continues to enlarge its responsibilities. The DOD’s mandate now includes wide-ranging scientific and medical research and international infrastructure projects, diffusing the focus on its core mission—like buying planes that don’t set themselves afire on the runway. That’s a disservice to America’s military and a burden to the country’s taxpayers.

The F-35 grounding is the latest setback in the development of an aircraft that’s already cost $400 billion. A recent GAO report noted that cost estimates for operating and supporting the F-35 fleet are now more than $1 trillion, “which DOD officials have deemed unaffordable.” The report went on: “Reliability is lower than expected for two variants” of the F-35, and the program has “limited additional opportunities to improve reliability.”

Meanwhile, Pentagon procurement is also running amok elsewhere: in the same week as the F-35 engine fire, the DOD’s inspector general issued a report on excess payments such as a payment to Bell Helicopters for gears at $8,124 each—more than 18 times the expected cost of $445.

(Excerpt) Read more at campaignforliberty.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: budget; dod

1 posted on 07/28/2014 11:11:22 AM PDT by MadIsh32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

“U.S. sent an F-8”, Haven’t had active F-8s in the DoD(US Navy/USMC) since the 1980s:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vought_F-8_Crusader


2 posted on 07/28/2014 11:14:54 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

These stories never mention the added cost of the bureaucratic paper trail, or re-tooling to produce parts that have been out of production for years, or even DECADES. . .

I still remember having to certify parts were not made with “conflict metals”, i.e. tantalum from certain countries in Africa.

The fact that the parts were PURE ALUMINUM was irrelevant. . .thank some Congresscritter for that. . .


3 posted on 07/28/2014 11:18:04 AM PDT by Salgak (Peace through Superior Firepower. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I think they might’ve meant the F-18 super hornet. Just a guess.

CC


4 posted on 07/28/2014 11:18:48 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

Most of the time paying more for items from toilet paper to aircraft is specified by congressional pork injected into appropriations and federal purchasing bills. These rules and specs ensure that congressional constituents or donors and friends are rewarded generously. Not just the DoD, the entire federal government.


5 posted on 07/28/2014 11:22:47 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32
This is the same argument I've seen every time the Air Force tries to buy a new aircraft. "Testing revealed a problem" --- That's what testing is for. "It's too expensive" --- Everything is too expensive when you compare to ancient technology. "Do you know how many swords and shields you could buy with that?".

The F-35 is supposed to replace the F-16 - an airplane that's been around since 1976. Most companies wouldn't have a 40 year old fleet of trucks, let alone airplanes that old.

6 posted on 07/28/2014 11:33:51 AM PDT by Rhinoman (SMSgt, USAF (Ret))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32
Government budgets create perverse incentives for departments to spend. Surprisingly, most government departments have a difficult time spending all of their budget. They literally have to invent creative ways to spend...

Our founding forefathers understood this and tried to limit government as much as possible...
7 posted on 07/28/2014 11:37:03 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

Congress can’t fix the Pentagon’s procurement problems because half the time Congress is responsible for crony-capitalist (contractors in the home district) add-ons in military contracts, add-ons the Pentagon agrees to NOT because without them the goal of an item’s use was jeopardized but just because getting approved by congress would be jeopardized without it.

When people complained about us buying Russian Helicopters for Afghanistan as part of our military aid agreement with Afghanistan they were either ignorant of or willingly blind to the total agreement’s cost, which included the helos, training, parts and supplies in a mutli-year pact, all of which were less expensive on the less complex, easier to operate, less sophisticated but well built Russian helos.

Under political pressure American military hardware has become a field of arrogant technological gold mines, for the contractors.


8 posted on 07/28/2014 11:41:17 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

5% Carry 100% of Free Republic Expense


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR Or Lose It

9 posted on 07/28/2014 12:04:22 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

Government has been economically gang banging middle America every way possible, every single aspect of everything they do for many years.

For example, they’ve charged American’s many hundreds of billions in tax dollars for border security, to keep the borders safe and secure etc.

We’ve all be burned, taken, ripped off, coned, and robbed at gun point, repeatedly over and over and on and on...


10 posted on 07/28/2014 12:05:42 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

At this link, the designer of the F-16 explains what’s wrong with the F-35. Most informative!

http://digg.com/video/the-designer-of-the-f-15-explains-just-how-inanely-stupid-the-f-35-is


11 posted on 07/28/2014 12:44:21 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war,and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

Maybe they can get a F-35 flyable for the next show in 2 years.


12 posted on 07/28/2014 1:50:51 PM PDT by nicepaco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson