Not at all. This whole "secular scientists" as atheists construct is yours to begin with--it'd be more accurate to say that if any scientist who accepts global warming (or whatever it is you think "secular scientists" think about homosexuality or abortion) believes in God, your argument is nullified.
As I said before, most scientists believe in God. And most of them don't let their belief get in the way of doing good science, which includes holding other scientists responsible for their work. This is different from ICR, which allows Brian Thomas and others to continually publish false and misleading material without ever issuing a retraction or, apparently, telling him to shape up.
And you accepted the premise of secular scientist:
Can you imagine the world we might be living in if secular scientists didn't always get it wrong? We might have ways to... prevent them from getting polio. Oh wait...
Jonas Salk wasn't a secularists, he beleived there was a God. Again, nice try!
--it'd be more accurate to say that if any scientist who accepts global warming (or whatever it is you think "secular scientists" think about homosexuality or abortion) believes in God, your argument is nullified.
You can't be secular and believe in God. Again, nice try!