Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poor families use 'supervouchers' to rent in city's priciest buildings
Crain's Chicago Busness ^ | 7-28-14 | Alby Gallun

Posted on 07/28/2014 7:04:53 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: afraidfortherepublic
One wonders if the beneficiaries of this largesse are FOO? (Friends of Obama)

Does a bear.......

21 posted on 07/28/2014 7:39:43 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Imagine A World Without FR.......


Click The Pic To Donate

Donate

22 posted on 07/28/2014 7:39:46 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
Maybe it's the renovation costs once the "beneficiary" moves out? Maybe it's the complaints from other tenants about the noise and filth that the "beneficiaries" bring with them? Maybe it's the loss of rental income when other tenants move out?

My Conservative heart bleeds for the Liberal Bleeding Heart.

23 posted on 07/28/2014 7:42:13 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Everyone knew that section 8 tenants were trouble so now they have a new name: the use of “housing choice vouchers,” formerly known as Section 8 vouchers
24 posted on 07/28/2014 7:58:54 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

If you are living in a $3,000 a month apartment and you are not paying any rent, then someone else is working to pay your rent.


25 posted on 07/28/2014 8:12:17 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
..the CHA to expand its housing voucher program so that more low-income residents can leave the city's roughest neighborhoods and start a new life in places with low poverty and crime and close to good schools and jobs.

Memphis tried this some years ago... seems the 'low income residents - (rather than escaping crime) - took the crime wave with them... The program was a disaster - spreading crime across the city rather than just concentrated in the black community. Police were unable to cope - as the drive time between incidents cut their effectiveness.

On the other hand if the Chicago Housing Authority can move these 'low income residents' into buildings where a large number of liberal elites live in a constant state of delusion, it might be a blessing. Liberal elites will discover reality...

26 posted on 07/28/2014 8:18:22 AM PDT by GOPJ (Liberal elites want Mexicans to be a servant class that supplies cheap drugs and easy women and kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie
Tony, does it matter what floor the people live on? Would you prefer if it was an apartment on the 5th floor? Personally, I don't agree with the program as far as giving vouchers to move into a high rent building. The residents there have paid a price to live in a luxury high rise. Why would anyone allow nonworking people-doesn't matter what their race is;whites and Hispanics get these vouchers also. This assimilation program has proven to be a huge failure in Chicago. Several years ago, former mayor Daley dismanteled Chicago's high rise projects and allowed the displaced residents to move in other neighborhoods which were previously relatively crime free. Now, look at the problems Chicago is having with gangs in basically every part of the city's south and west sides. Years ago, low incom residents were allowed to relocate to the Chicago suburbs. Those locations, relatively peaceful and crime free, have changed drastically into mini Chicagos and the police departments have been overwhelmed and in some cases can barely keep up. Anyway, sorry about the long editorial but, I'm just sayin’.
27 posted on 07/28/2014 9:23:31 AM PDT by Sonnyboy77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

HaHa!!!
maybe some TB carriers can move in also


28 posted on 07/28/2014 9:34:07 AM PDT by ronniesgal (Good Grief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
In addition to following the money, I’d follow the relationships of the people getting these luxury grants to those processing them.

Bingo. In the old days, investigative reporters would check this sort of thing out. Today, they all play their role as obedient Regime sock puppets.

29 posted on 07/28/2014 9:43:42 AM PDT by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Marc recently sold the building, which had the most supervouchers by far among all properties, according to the CHA.

This sentence caught my eye. I guess MarcRealty wanted to take the upfront cash but not deal with the aftermath of "super-diversifying" its building.

30 posted on 07/28/2014 10:04:40 AM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Most landlords agree with the effort to expand
the use of “housing choice vouchers,”
formerly known as Section 8 vouchers, to
more prosperous parts of the city.


I don’t believe this. The author offers no evidence and it defies common sense.


31 posted on 07/28/2014 1:05:21 PM PDT by pluvmantelo (Democrats:the party of moral hazard, the IRS, the NSA and the heckler's veto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pluvmantelo

Donchaknow?

All owners of upscale real estate want people to rent from them who have no stake in upkeep of the property.

Unless they’re racists, of course.


32 posted on 07/28/2014 1:08:32 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Exactly.


33 posted on 07/28/2014 1:13:10 PM PDT by pluvmantelo (Democrats:the party of moral hazard, the IRS, the NSA and the heckler's veto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
wait till they start buzzing in all the dealers, junkies, bangers, pimps and whores for party time...

wait, they have a doorman to do it for them, nevermind

34 posted on 07/28/2014 3:59:53 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

A 25th floor apartment may be some people’s ideas of luxury but not mine. I would rather live in a camper trailer on a creek bank than in any super high-rise on the lakefront in Chicago.


35 posted on 07/28/2014 7:29:52 PM PDT by RipSawyer (OPM is the religion of the sheeple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson