Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: X Fretensis

It was commerce and the right of a state to freely engage. DC and the Northern states disagreed with the South.
The Mississippi River was a huge player in the Northern Aggression.

Understand history, not political BS from your “changing history 101” class.


25 posted on 07/28/2014 12:45:22 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storarned m chaser from the west)/?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: eyedigress

Exactly how was it “commerce”. How did the Buchanan administration interfere with southern commerce. Did they forbid the South the right to sell cotton or tobacco to whom ever they pleased. Did they confiscate southern goods and products. Did the Buchanan administration order southern planters to stop farming cotton, tobacco, indigo or rice. Explain how it was commerce, if you can.


26 posted on 07/28/2014 1:09:05 PM PDT by X Fretensis (How)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson