Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin
The problem is, in the modern republican party dominated by NeoCons, realists don't have a lot of pull.

Well, I might agree at least in the sense that most of our leaders, McCain et al., are idiots and therefore can do nothing right. I do not like this term "NeoCon" since it fills into Ron Paul type narratives, though I know that people use it and might not necessarily use it the way a Paulistinian does.

58 posted on 07/27/2014 10:44:41 AM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
I think most people us the term NeoCons, but some in the media defer and say hawk rather than NeoCon.

Its a doctrine, and it needs to be considered in the Post Cold War Period. You could that there is no difference between the Wolfowitz Doctrine, the NeoCon Doctrine, or the Bush Doctrine.

Broadly speaking, the NeoCons are unilateralists and idealists.

60 posted on 07/27/2014 11:12:13 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson