Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

“I agree that it was us who probably needed tactical nukes to stop the overwhelming attack energy and capabilities that the Warsaw pact was built on”

Ansel you actually listed the primary reason why we saw the “pact’ as a serious military threat from the German side.

We had the bulk of our forces in Vietnam. We had troops and equipment scattered all over the planet. The “Pact” had all of their men and all of their stuff lined up against us,a inferior force in numbers.

Russia and that “pact” were not as big as they seemed.


110 posted on 07/26/2014 12:07:40 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Have you reached your breaking point yet? If not now....then when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat

That Pact was massive and powerful they had 6,000,000 men under arms in 1988, against our 4,500,000, 230 Divisions against 121 Divisions, weaponry was similar, yet you gloss over that and have a neat little plan where it all works out in the end.

I don’t know why you keep saying the things you are saying.

We maintained steady forces in NATO, we didn’t transfer them to Vietnam, we increased manpower to get EXTRA troops for Vietnam, and NATO was more than just the U.S. anyway.

You also seem to have some particular year, or years, that you keep relating to.


114 posted on 07/26/2014 12:25:57 AM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson