Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/25/2014 5:42:54 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

No! The student loans are now federal loans.


2 posted on 07/25/2014 5:48:49 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

All these proposals have two things in common

1 - Keep the easy money flowing to students and colleges

2 - Let someone else pay off the moocher students debt

In Liberal-Land once you make it past the abortionist’s knife you are set for life as long as you vote the right way.


3 posted on 07/25/2014 5:50:33 AM PDT by Iron Munro (IRONY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
"Should the law be changed?"

Of course! Changed to require colleges to cosign student loans! If colleges were the ones on the hook if the student defaults, we wouldn't see nearly the number of defaults we see now. The main driver of the incredible college cost inflation over the past 35 years has been the easy availability of gov't money.


4 posted on 07/25/2014 5:50:45 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

From the article:
“If individuals can escape from heavy credit card, medical bills,
and other debts through bankruptcy,
what should be different about student loans?”

“Unlike other kinds of debts, the law does not permit students
to wipe out their college debts by declaring bankruptcy.”

“Brannon has a good reply:
“If we are concerned that allowing students to escape debt via bankruptcy
might leave the government on the hook,
we could make the institutions of higher learning
assume their loan payments after a bankruptcy.”


5 posted on 07/25/2014 5:53:42 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I’m still trying to figure out how to short the student loan market...


6 posted on 07/25/2014 5:58:51 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

A student loan forgiveness scheme is going to win somebody an election. That is inevitable at this point IMO.


8 posted on 07/25/2014 6:05:42 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The federal government needs to get out of the student loan business altogether.

Until that happy day arrives, going forward loans should only be made to students in majors that stand a decent chance of getting a job and being able to repay the loan.

No more money to grievance studies or transgendered Aleutian folk dancing.


9 posted on 07/25/2014 6:09:18 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I am so sick of this. If you are going to let students discharge this debt, then have the colleges make the loans. Let them suffer. They are to blame in large part for suckering kids into taking useless overpriced courses and then throwing them to the wolves in the market. Of course, kids who take these courses and don’t take their studies seriously are to blame too. The one party who is not to blame is the US taxpayer, who is getting screwed left and right already.


10 posted on 07/25/2014 6:14:43 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/financial-fitness/many-over-50-are-still-saddled-with-student-loans


12 posted on 07/25/2014 6:21:06 AM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles (Remember, you can't spell "progressive" without "SS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

How about a program where a person can voluntarily join some type of a civilian or military “corp” for X number of years with each year paying off a portion of their student loans. Sort of an indentured servitude program.


13 posted on 07/25/2014 6:24:11 AM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles (Remember, you can't spell "progressive" without "SS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Student loans should be cut by 85%.

We’d all be much better off: taxpayers; the colleges, which would have to refocus on simply providing a good education within financial constraints; and students who could work their way through lower-cost schools, value their studies more, and graduate without debt.


14 posted on 07/25/2014 6:24:25 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Not only no, but HELL NO!

The terms of these loans were no secret when the students signed up for them. The fact that they are not dischargeable in bankruptcy was abundantly clear. They should be held to the terms of the loan they signed.

Since these loans are written with no collateral other than the future earnings of the student, no bank in the world would write them unless it was clear that they were not dischargeable in bankruptcy. Otherwise, every single borrower would just declare bankruptcy the day after graduation. Their only assets at that point are their diploma, and their fond memories of five years of undergraduate education well partied. The lender can’t recover any money from those!

If you want to change the law, to make all new student loans dischargeable in bankruptcy, I’m all for that. But without any guarantee, no bank would write that loan for anything less than 20% interest. And even at that, they would probably lose money.

If the low interest loans are dischargeable, it is nothing more than a free education for every student willing to commit fraud. The few people who would repay the loan would be chumps. We should not have a policy that rewards fraud.


18 posted on 07/25/2014 6:26:50 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (Health Care Haiku: If You Have a Right / To the Labor I Provide / I Must Be Your Slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

End ALL federal aid to education, including student loans.
Federal money flowing to colleges is what provides the breeding ground for Cloward-Piven types. Most college money is now spent on administrations that are more concerned with diversity than education. The result is the quality of a college education today is so poor that many grads are lucky to get a job at McDonald’s.
The only way to get rid of these leeches is to starve them out by cutting off their funds.


20 posted on 07/25/2014 6:27:29 AM PDT by wdk535
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I think the colleges should be nationalized.


36 posted on 07/25/2014 8:21:02 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. Hat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
He's right that the incentives need changing. But his solution is overcomplicated. Colleges shouldn't be in the loan business. Down the road, his scheme would likely come to naught, and there would be a lot of political pressure to "fix" it and relieve the colleges who screwed up.

The proper solution is to make getting a college loan like getting a car loan or a house loan, but without the car or house available to cover default. College loans should be fully dischargeable in bankruptcy. And no way should be the taxpayers be making the loans!

Interest rates would shoot up. Tuition would necessarily come down. And the effect would be to bring college costs back in line with inflation, cut the deadwood out of university administration, and eliminate seven-digit / year college presidents.

47 posted on 07/26/2014 2:22:58 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson