Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I seem to remember him being a little "iffy" on the 2nd in the past. Did I misread something?
1 posted on 07/23/2014 9:34:03 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

He started off iffy about guns but has come around. I’m just not sure how much is heart felt conviction and how much is political expediency.


2 posted on 07/23/2014 9:39:27 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

A bit of damage control, me thinks.


3 posted on 07/23/2014 9:39:36 AM PDT by QDaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Well, that’s the silliest argument. There will be no frontal assault and, well, if there is ... drones, tanks, technology beyond reason, etc.

However, we do have the right to bear arms. It can protect us against many things. But to think it would protect us from a determined government is laughable.


4 posted on 07/23/2014 9:39:57 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

His prior comments

“Asked by Beck for his thoughts on the Second Amendment, Carson gave the popular pro-gun argument: “There’s a reason for the Second Amendment; people do have the right to have weapons.”

But when asked whether people should be allowed to own “semi-automatic weapons,” the doctor replied: “It depends on where you live.”

“I think if you live in the midst of a lot of people, and I’m afraid that that semi-automatic weapon is going to fall into the hands of a crazy person, I would rather you not have it,” Carson elaborated.”

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/conservative-hero-ben-carson-to-beck-you-have-no-right-to-semi-automatic-weapons-in-large-cities/


5 posted on 07/23/2014 9:42:01 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
I seem to remember him being a little "iffy" on the 2nd in the past. Did I misread something?

No, he's probably starting to take all this "Carson for President" talk seriously.

12 posted on 07/23/2014 10:01:53 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I also remember him being a little “iffy” on the Second Amendment. A month or so ago I received a phone call that was supposedly a poll but was directed towards Dr. Carson and fund raising for him. As I recall they read a statement by him. I said I didn’t know enough about him to support him at this time but wouldn’t rule it out in the future or donate at this time. I brought up the Second Amendment issue and indicated it meant a lot to me and that I believed he had sidestepped it or not been explicit in his support for it. I’m sure I’m not alone in mentioning that and this could be the result. So is he expressing conviction or saying what he believes he should say?


18 posted on 07/23/2014 10:59:20 AM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

He’s evolving, as he has a finger in the air to see which way the wind is blowing.

Wanna bet he took a lot of flack for his previous statement(s) regarding this issue?


19 posted on 07/23/2014 11:01:03 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Nice to see he’s getting up to speed on the issue. He needs to do some SERIOUS PREP work if he’s going to be running for the big prize.


23 posted on 07/23/2014 3:42:10 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson