Obamacare Hit by Contradictory Fed. Ct. Decisions (Afro Reports)

Afro ^ | 7/22/14 | AP

[YourAdHere]

WASHINGTON (AP)

[Sacajaweau]

So the object was to have states pick up the tab for the subsidies?

The wording of the law is not ambiguous.

[17th Miss Regt]

That would invalidate an Internal Revenue Service regulation that tried to sort out confusing wording in the law by concluding that Congress intended for consumers in all 50 states to have subsidized coverage.

There is nothing confusing about the wording unless you are a liberal looking to make sure that Obamacare goes forward regardless of what the law says. This 4th Circuit Court judge is one of those.

[Sacajaweau]

And that FED subsidized coverage is paid for with what? Those monies have to be in the budget.

[Sacajaweau]

http://www.heritage.org/research/factsheets/2013/07/defund-obamacare

[17th Miss Regt]

Just print it. The currency is really worthless anyway.

[Sacajaweau]

http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=9729

Worth the read. Looks like they expected ALL states to set up their own exchange.

[Sacajaweau]

http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=9729