Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/22/2014 11:40:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

Normally, I’d say this is a pretty stupid idea. But over the past two years...I’ve kinda read up on the sugar mafia. There’s an enormous effort to put excess sugar into just about everything these days. A guy could read the side of packages and grasp this....but the addiction angle is hurting us because you just can’t quit most sugar products now. While I think regulation is stupid....so is using excess sugar in our diet. It took me two years to wean myself off all sodas (even diet stuff).


2 posted on 07/22/2014 11:44:13 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

My initial instinct was to propose a per-word tax for city council members... thinking they need to listen more and talk/do less. Then I remembered this was San Francisco and realized I quit caring about what they do in the city and county of SF a long time ago.


5 posted on 07/23/2014 12:13:55 AM PDT by leakinInTheBlueSea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

It would be more direct and honest if SFO were to vote in favor of mass suicide.


6 posted on 07/23/2014 12:19:57 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

“harmful beverages”

Sugar consumption is a lifestyle choice. Imagine if San Francisco tried to tax harmful behaviors, as well.


7 posted on 07/23/2014 12:26:53 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Only a bunch of commie fsggots could come up with an idea like this.


12 posted on 07/23/2014 12:38:44 AM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

“...according to the best economist in the city.”

That’s not much of a compliment.


13 posted on 07/23/2014 1:04:29 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

There should be a substantial tax on buggery. It has enormous health care costs. Will Progressive San Francisco be taking the lead on this crisis ?


14 posted on 07/23/2014 1:11:14 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

That’s quite a tax. If a can of soda costs 50 cents, it’s a ~50% tax. If it costs a dollar, it’s still a ~25% tax.

A 2 liter bottle is 67.6 ounces so you’d get a tax of $1.35 on a 2 liter bottle.

A case of cans would be 288 ounces with a tax of $5.76, more than a case of Sam’s cola actually costs here.


16 posted on 07/23/2014 1:16:58 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

And the idiots thought the authoritarians would stop at cigarettes.

Don’t you know, it’s cool to hate fat people now, since hating cigarette smokers has proven to be such a tax success.

Next up, on the fat haters targets: vegetable oils and animal fat.


17 posted on 07/23/2014 1:51:58 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

What about HFCS? Is that considered ‘sugar’? What about artificial sweeteners?


18 posted on 07/23/2014 2:48:24 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Seems like a great business opportunity to me. Find the nearest small town outside of San Fran and open a convenience store and advertise that you offer sugar laden drinks and snacks with no tax. I would drive a few miles just to stick a finger in their eyes, if I used those products.

Aint free enterprise great.


19 posted on 07/23/2014 3:23:51 AM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Another tax?
Yeah. let's just keep expanding our wonderful, efficient, beneficent, governments at every level.
21 posted on 07/23/2014 3:55:57 AM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

sodastream and the liberals in SanFran can go pound sand


23 posted on 07/23/2014 4:00:09 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Next the Tea Tax and after that the Stamp Act. I feel more British everyday of the new monarchy.
24 posted on 07/23/2014 5:25:32 AM PDT by lostboy61 (Lock and Load and stand your ground!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
The SF Board of Supervisors should tax stupidity; every Democrat voter needs to pay a stupidity tax [$1 to $10] to cast a ballot. It would be a great way to mug liberals by introducing them to reality and put money in the city's coffers.
25 posted on 07/23/2014 7:37:33 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson